Health Care Industry
Industry: Email Alert RSS FeedA 26 year physiological description of a National Hockey League team
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, August, 2008 by H.A. Quinney, Randy Dewart, Alex Game, Gary Snydmiller, Darren Warburton, Gordon Bell
The ice-hockey players examined in this investigation were evaluated to assess their individual fitness levels prior to each season and were required to be active players on the team during the year of evaluation. The data set was coded for individual player, year, position, and a success criterion. To investigate whether a successful season was related to overall fitness levels, the authors used points acquired during the season as determined by the NHL combined with playoff success to classify a season as successful or not. The cut-off for number of points was set at 90, since this represented a time when the present team reached the final playoff series 7 times, winning the championship (Stanley Cup) 5 times. The team earned less than 90 points 14 times in the past 26 years. During these seasons, the team did not make the playoffs 5 times and when the team was in the post season, they only advanced to the third round of the playoffs once. Note that the seasons deemed successful using these criteria were associated with a win percentage of greater than 52% (win percentage = (season points / total possible points) x 100).
Most RecentHealth Care Articles
Physiological assessments
The order for completion of the fitness assessments was as follows: body composition, anaerobic power, musculoskeletal fitness (trunk forward flexion, grip strength, abdominal endurance), and cardio-respiratory fitness.
Body composition
Height (cm) was measured with an anthropometric tape to the nearest 0.2 cm without shoes and with each subject standing erect against a wall. A set scale was placed on the head while the subject stood as upright as possible. Body mass (kg) was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg without shoes and in shorts, socks, and with or without a t-shirt on a beam balance scale (Health-o-meter, Bridgeview, Ill.). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the following formula: body mass (in kg) / [height.sup.2] (in m). There were 4 common skinfold sites taken each year over the 26 years of data collection that were common to all players. These 4 sites were used to calculate a sum of skinfolds to represent body fat content of each player. Percent body fat was not calculated, since no prediction formula for professional hockey players has been validated using these 4 skinfold sites. The mean of 2 measurements within 0.4 mm of each other were added together for each skinfold site to create the sum. The 4 anatomically landmarked sites were the mid tricep, subscapular, iliac crest, and mid medial calf. All measurements were made on the right side of the body using skinfold calipers.
Musculoskeletal fitness
Trunk forward flexion was assessed with a sit and reach test using a Wells-Dillon flexometer. Two trials were allowed and the highest score to the nearest 0.5 cm was recorded. Combined grip strength of the right and left hand was assessed using a hand dynamometer. A sum was calculated in kilograms from the best score of 2 trials recorded for each hand. Abdominal muscle endurance was assessed using a modified curl-up protocol that controlled tempo at a rate of 25 curl-ups in 60 s using a standardized protocol as previously reported by our laboratory (Quinney et al. 1984). Subjects were stopped if a maximum of 100 curl-ups was achieved. Note that the assessment of trunk flexibility and abdominal endurance did not begin until 1982.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article


