Brought to you by IBM
- Insurance 2020: Innovating beyond old models
- Insurance 2020: Now what?
- Customer advocates: Your most valuable asset
- IBM and Cisco front office solutions for retail banking
- Opening act - Streamlining a bank's account-opening process can have a dramatic effect on customer experience and the bottom line
- The Agile CFO; Enabling the innovation path to growth
- The Evolution of Asset Mangement
- The Global CFO Study 2008
- Thinking Through Uncertainty: CFOs scrutinize Non-Financial Risk
Featured White Papers
- Technology-based learning: Extending reach & ensuring Leadership Development effectiveness (SkillSoft)
- 5 Strategies for Making Sales the Engine for Growth (AchieveGlobal)
- Hosted CRM comparison guide (Inside CRM)
Using budgets for performance evaluation: effects of resource allocation and horizontal information asymmetry on budget proposals, budget slack, and performance.
Accounting Review, October, 2002 by Joseph G. Fisher
I. INTRODUCTION
Traditional budget-based compensation plans provide economic incentives for subordinate managers to misrepresent (understate) their productivity and build slack into budgets (Horngren et al. 2000, 185; Jensen 2001). Slack creates a bias in budgets and can reduce firm profits due to costly planning errors and greater compensation or perquisite consumption for subordinate managers. To mitigate budget slack, researchers developed "truth-inducing" compensation schemes (e.g., Weitzman 1976) that explicitly reward subordinates for the truthful revelation of their private information.
Empirical research documents that truth-inducing compensation schemes do reduce subordinates' misrepresentations of productivity and budget slack (see, e.g., Young ...
