The effect of quality assessment and directional goal commitment on auditors' acceptance of client-preferred accounting methods.

Accounting Review,  July, 2003  by Kathryn Kadous

• E-mail
• Print
• Link

ABSTRACT: Previous research demonstrates that auditors' directional goals influence their reporting decisions. For example, when auditors have goals of accepting client-preferred accounting methods, they tend to exploit ambiguity in reporting standards to justify those methods, even when they are aggressive (Hackenbrack and Nelson 1996).

We report an experimental investigation of the likely effectiveness of regulation designed to curb this tendency. Specifically, regulators suggest that having auditors identify benchmarks or assess the quality of various methods will "raise the bar" for method acceptability, thereby reducing auditor acceptance of aggressive reporting methods. However, this reasoning ignores the fact that ambiguity typically surrounds ...