The reason behind the rules: finding and using the philosophy of the federal sentencing guidelines.
American Criminal Law Review, January, 2003 by Paul J. Hofer
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Finding and Using the Federal Philosophy of Sentencing B. How the Guidelines' Philosophy Got Lost 1. The Critics Speak 2. The Root of the Problem 3. The Original Commission's Compromises and Accommodations II. THE PROJECT OF RATIONAL RECONSTRUCTION A. The Consequences of Philosophy-Free Guidelines 1. The Empty Idea of Disparity 2. Missing Criteria for Evaluation 3. Weakened Rational Decision-making 4. Missing Tools for Legal Reasoning B. The Method of Rational Reconstruction C. Sources of the Guidelines' Philosophy 1. The SRA and Mistretta 2. The Guidelines and Commentary 3. General Justifying Aims Versus Specific...
Most Recent Reference Articles
- ARAB EUROPEAN RELATIONS - Dec 22 - Russia Denies Selling Missile System To Iran
- EGYPT - Dec 29 - Opposition Says Mubarak Blessed Israeli Attacks
- ARAB AFFAIRS - Dec 22 - Syria Will Eventually Move To Direct Talks With Israel
- ARAB AFFAIRS - Dec 30 - GCC Denounces Massacre
- ARAB ISRAELI RELATIONS - Israel Issues An Appeal To Palestinians In Gaza
Most Recent Reference Publications
Most Popular Reference Articles
- Credit card debt on college campuses: causes, consequences, and solutions
- The Greek chorus, Jimmy the Greek got it wrong but so did his critics - Jimmy Snyder and his views on pro sports and race
- How Tyler Perry rose from homelessness to a $5 million mansion
- 9 questions to ask your new lover: what you were afraid to ask, but always wanted to know
- Living by the word: light the candles


