Almost right.(Correspondence)(Letter to the Editor)
American Prospect, The, February, 2005 by Joffe, Richard
 | Content provided in partnership with |  |
THERE ARE TWO FLAWS that should not be overlooked in John B. Judis and Ruy Teixeira's otherwise enlightening analysis of voting patterns in the 2004 presidential election ["Movement Interruptus,' January]. First, the authors' conclusion that "the key to [George W.] Bush's victory was reviving [Ronald] Reagan's support among the white working class" is based in part on a mistaken assumption that white voters without college educations, who voted relatively heavily for Bush, belong to the working class.
- Most Popular Articles in News
- The Ten Best Laptop bags
- Tata plans cheapest-ever car for Indian market
- GLOBALIZATION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF UNDERDEVELOPMENT OF THE THIRD WORLD
- Corn is good for you; Corn is not only a tasty treat, but also a cereal that ...
- THE 50 BEST STYLISH HANDBAGS TO CARRY
- More »
In fact, there are many older white women without college ...
Read the rest of this article with a Free Trial at HighBeam Research.