Business Services Industry

GST and deposits: the story behind the news.

Australasian Business Intelligence, September, 2006

Byline: Paul Stacey

Sep 15, 2006 (Taxation in Australia - ABIX via COMTEX) -- The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) in the Reliance Carpet Company case caused a lot of angst. The AAT ruled that the Australian Taxation Office was within its rights to levy the goods and services tax on a forfeited deposit on a sale of property that did not go through. Not surprisingly, Reliance Carpet has since announced that it will appeal the AAT's decision. Industries such as the tourism sector were already angry with the ATO as a result of its issue of GSTR 2006/2 in April 2006. Companies are of the view that the ATO is expecting them to account for the GST on their taxable supplies sooner than they should need to.

Publication Date: September...

Premium Content Partnership | HighBeam Research provides an in-depth online archive library of reference works. HighBeam Research
 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here