Slimming the general. (defense industry drawdown)

Economist (US), The, January, 1993

The incoming Clinton administration has three policy options on the defense drawdown available: let market forces operate, create a conversion plan, or institute broad procurement reforms. Only this last option promises the cost savings that could finance worker retraining.

LESS on defence means more taxpayers' dollars to spend elsewhere. That part of America's peace dividend was easy to see--and cash in on. By 1997 the defence budget will probably be at least 30% smaller in real terms than it was in 1987. But it was also supposed to provide the swords-into-ploughshares bonus: the chance to take valuable resources, especially highly skilled workers, and switch them into commercial businesses. Banking this bit of the dividend will be a lot harder.

The proper role...

Premium Content Partnership | HighBeam Research provides an in-depth online archive library of reference works. HighBeam Research

 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here