Scientific panel does little to quell pollution debate; Group likes cap, trade; questions NSR reform.(new source review)(Discussion)
Waste News, July, 2006 by Geiselman, Bruce
Byline: Bruce Geiselman An independent panel of scientists has expressed mixed opinions about the Bush administration's approach toward addressing air pollution from power plants and other industrial sources. The scientists questioned whether proposed reforms to the New Source Review program might result in higher emissions than under the existing NSR program, but they also indicated that a cap-and-trade program favored by the Bush administration could be a more cost-effective means of reducing harmful emissions.
The National Research Council, an arm of the National Academies, concluded that the Environmental Protection Agency has inadequate information to determine how the Bush administration's proposed changes to the New Source Review program...
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
