Business Services Industry
MMC struggles to replace power plant in Chula Vista
San Diego Business Journal, May 14, 2007 by Thomas York
To catch a glimpse of the absurdist political theater that passes for serious public discourse in San Diego County, one need peer only as far as Chula Vista.
For the past year, MMC Energy Inc. has been attempting to get approvals to replace an existing, but outdated 40-megawatt peakload power plant with an advanced, cleaner-burning 93-megawatt plant.
The existing plant, acquired by New York-based MMC in January 2006, served our region well in providing reserve electricity during last summer's chronic heat wave.
Since last summer, MMC, which also owns plants in two other Southern California locations, has spent untold hundreds of thousands of dollars submitting the required paperwork to the city Planning Department, and courting City Council, seeking permits for its project.
Now, after 12 months of effort, Chula Vista demurred, saying it can't really OK a replacement plant, and sent MMC to the state Energy Commission for approval.
Here's the irony. The plant will be approved, and will be built--Chula Vista just doesn't want to make it easy for MMC.
As we all know, San Diego--not to mention the rest of California--faces a shortfall in electric power generation capacity, especially at peak periods.
Score Points
But the council and planners know they can score points with the electorate, or at least the special-interest pockets of the electorate, by turning over the decision-making to state bureaucrats.
They can honestly say they didn't approve the project, while at the same time knowing all too well that the project will be OK'd--eventually.
The problem is that these thespian tactics end up costing MMC possibly millions in the added costs of going to Sacramento, a process that will take another year to complete.
Had Chula Vista's officials done what's right, they would have granted approvals and the replacement plant would be on course for construction.
To be fair, Chula Vista has its reasons for closely examining MMC's submittal, but no reasons to reject it.
First, the existing facility sits near a less-advantaged area of the city--an area that tends to get more than its fair share of ungainly industrial projects.
Second, city officials have been tangling over the future of a bay front power plant owned by LS Power. There, the New Jersey utility wants to demolish the current plant, and replace it with a smaller, more efficient plant.
However, the city wants the existing plant removed--with no new plant in its place, though it has no power to do so because the plant sits within the San Diego Unified Port District lands.
Could Chula Vista's officials be taking out their frustrations on MMC's plant, the future of which they do have power over?
Improvements
MMC's proposed replacement plant will improve upon the old plant in several different aspects.
It will produce more power using less gas, and it will better serve the existing plant in that it provides more than twice the capacity.
Moreover, the new plant will add up to $80-plus million in new capital investment, which means higher assessment and hence higher property tax revenue. The assessed value of the existing plant is now just $5.4 million.
But, think of the message that the city is sending to the rest of the business community.
This drama involving MMC is not only theater of the absurd, it's politics of the absurd as well.
Thomas York is editor of the San Diego Business Journal.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- "Do not rely on a single economy" ; Larsen and Toubro (L and T) was affected due to the slowdown particularly the products businesses, which include switchgears, construction equipment and industrial bars.
- "The first deliberate call we took was not to lay off anybody" ; The diversified group decided to reskill all surplus workers.
- "Government had to step up its demand" ; The downturn affected the government as much as India Inc. The outgoing advisor to the Government of India details its impact and its lessons.
- "Help your customers even in difficult times" ; Oil was at an all-time high at over $135 per barrel just before the financial meltdown. Then oil crashed to a low of $35 per barrel in January this year, bringing down any fresh demand for pipes fr
- "You have to be visible as a leader" ; Transparency is a standard operating procedure for communications during a downturn.
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- Using object-oriented analysis and design over traditional structured analysis and design
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions



