Business Services Industry

Editorial: Consider true backstop cost.(Brief Article)

Business Insurance, August, 2002

First impressions can be deceiving, as a recently released study on the costs of competing terrorism insurance bills indicates. As we report on page 2, the American Insurance Assn. commissioned Tillinghast-Towers Perrin to estimate the costs to the federal government of two terrorism insurance bills.

The bill passed by the House would allow the government to lend money to insurers to cover future terrorism-related losses, and insurers would have to pay back the money. The Senate bill would allow the federal government to share costs, with no payback provisions. At first glance, a payback program would appear less expensive than a cost-share program. But the Tillinghast study found that just the opposite seemed likely. Because the House plan would kick in at a...

Premium Content Partnership | HighBeam Research provides an in-depth online archive library of reference works. HighBeam Research
 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here