Business Services Industry

Supreme Court to revisit issue of appropriate punitive awards; Tort reform backers hope for more clarity.

Business Insurance, June, 2006 by Hofmann, Mark A.

Byline: MARK A. HOFMANN WASHINGTON-Tort reform advocates hope that the Supreme Court will use an Oregon case to clarify further when a punitive damage award is so disproportionate to underlying compensatory damages as to become unconstitutional. The case, Philip Morris vs. Mayola Williams, stems from a Feb.

2 Oregon Supreme Court decision that upheld the award of $79.5 million in punitive damages to the widow of a smoker who had died of lung cancer in 1997. Mayola Williams' husband, Jesse, had been a three-pack-a-day smoker. Ms. Williams sued Philip Morris, now part of Altria Group Inc., for alleged fraud and ultimately received an award of $521,000 in compensatory damages and $79.5 million in punitive damages. The U.S. Supreme Court sent the matter...

Premium Content Partnership | HighBeam Research provides an in-depth online archive library of reference works. HighBeam Research
 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here