Appraisal Journal

View more issues:

Articles in September, 2006 issue of Appraisal Journal

• Protocols for valuations.
  by Kummerow, Max
• Land used for duck hunting not classified as agricultural.(cases in brief)(Senachwine Club v. Board of Review)(Brief article)
• The impact of contract for deed financing on Minnesota forest land markets.
  by Kilgore, Michael A.
• Right of reasonable access and loss of view not compensable in eminent domain case.(cases in brief)(Utah Department of Transportation v. Ivers)
• Rebuilding neighborhood's infrastructure entitles taxpayer to property tax exemption.(cases in brief)(College Corner, L.P. v. DLGF)(Brief article)
• Post-Kelo legislation on eminent domain impacts valuations.(notes and issues)(Law overview)
  by Morton, Justin R.
• Institutional controls and contaminated property valuation.(environment and the appraiser)
  by Jackson, Thomas O.; Sowinski, J. Michael, Jr.
• Supplemental assessments limited to improvements on land, not changes in value of land.(cases in brief)(District of Columbia v. Edison Place)(Brief article)
• Property risk assessment: a simulation approach.
  by Slade, Barrett A.
• Possibility of assemblage not applied to taxation.(cases in brief)(Route 188, LLC v. Town of Middlebury)
• Federal government appraisal contract work: where to find it and how to get it.(notes and issues)
  by Holmes, Kathleen M.
• Economy set for soft landing.(financial views)
  by DeLisle, James R.
• Value of incentives not applicable in eminent domain case.(cases in brief)(Southtown Properties v. City of Fort Wayne)
• Before and after rule not exclusive method of measurement in partial condemnation case.(cases in brief)(State v. Paul Bunyan Rifle & Sportsman's Club)(Brief article)
• Billboards and the legal and regulatory environment.
  by Stoops, Dwain R.; Wolverton, Marvin L.
• Methods of proof offered by expert witnesses lack reliability in condemnation case.(cases in brief)(North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Haywood County)