- Breaking News San Mateo County ninth-graders struggle to stay fit
- Breaking News Food and wine events
- Breaking News Ask Amy: What To Do When the Doctor Isn t in the House
- Breaking News Ed Blonz: Keep your diet normal pre-surgery
Tribes' special status a product of law and history
0 Comments | USA TODAY, January, 2006 | by Jim Drinkard
WASHINGTON -- Indian tribes defending their right to give unlimited political campaign contributions say they are treated differently for legitimate reasons dating back to George Washington.
"Tribes are governments, not corporations. They are a completely different animal," says Markham Ericson, a Washington attorney for New York's Oneida tribe.
Tribes are considered "persons" under campaign-finance law. In 2000, the Oneida tribe sought to give more than the total allowed by law for "individuals." Ericson argued to the Federal Election Commission that the limit shouldn't apply; the FEC agreed.
Since then, tribes have become more active givers and are attracting increased scrutiny because of a scandal involving lobbyist Jack Abramoff and tribes with casinos...
- Getting to the root of beautiful hair: shiny, silky hair begins with a healthy scalp - includes list of resources and a recipe for an herbal scalp tonic
- Industry Experts Launch Money Management Resources to Help People Overcome Debt and Learn Proper Money Management Practices
- Made from scratch: When Honda built a plant in Alabama it also built a workforce-using local workers who had no experience in making cars - Recruitment & Hiring
- Portfolio forecasting tools: what you need to know
- A multi-class SVM classifier utilizing binary decision tree
- Why fly solo when an executive assistant can accelerate your CLNC® business?
- Banking technology, technological learning and competition: comparative case studies in Thai banking
- Building a nursing portfolio