On MovieTome: Get your first glimpse of STAR TREK!
Find Articles in:
all
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Sports
Health
Autos
Arts
Home & Garden
advertisement
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with
Thomson / Gale

Drear Abbie. - Review - movie review

ArtForum,  Sept, 2000  by Thomas Frank

THOMAS FRANK ON STEAL THIS MOVIE!

I DON'T REMEMBER precisely when I first learned to equate Grateful Dead fandom with class privilege, when I finally figured out that those hokey dancing bears glued to the rear window of a Saab signaled that you were tailgating a pleasure-loving scion of American entitlement, but it must have been around the same time that Abbie Hoffman, having resurfaced after a decade underground, was beginning to dabble in the hopeless leftist causes of the '80s. This unhappy coincidence was no doubt what provoked my first glimmers of doubt concerning the '60s counterculture.

Yes, there was something genuinely inspiring about Hoffman's deeds in the '60s, though I only knew about his exploits later, through books and old TV footage. And yes, I wanted deeply to believe, as Hoffman had, that rock music harbored some profound revolutionary potential, that youth culture represented something more than the demographic advertisers are keenest to reach. But by the '80s, the bands that had once seemed so menacing to the established order were just a bunch of long-haired millionaires locking horns in a pointless culture war with a bunch of short-haired millionaires, the issues between them boiling down to whether a millionaire could snort a little coke when he felt like it or whether a millionaire ought to be going to church instead. If there was revolution to be found in youth culture, it clearly resided in the then-still-vibrant postpunk scene. But the '60s? Who's surprised anymore when they hear the billionaires of Silicon Valley couch their libertarian politics in the language of the W oodstock generation, or when they read that George W. Bush's chief media consultant is a nightclub-owning hipster with a Dead sticker on his SUV? No, the only ones still interested in promoting the counterculture as a truly revolutionary moment are the ones who profit by it: Hollywood, where the great lifestyle emancipation of those years could never be exaggerated; and religious conservatives, for whom the '60s remain a vivid memory of Satan's recent reign on earth, a talisman to be waved every four years to snap the faithful back into line.

That Abbie Hoffman was able to foresee the commodification of his revolution, at least to a degree, is part of what makes him such a compelling figure. To be sure, Hoffman was one of the worst abusers of the language of the Manichaean '60s: His 1969 book Woodstock Nation is filled with denunciations of "Amerikan" "pig" civilization and overheated celebrations of hip culture. He sometimes seemed genuinely to believe that pleasure alone, people doing their own thing, would overturn The System. But he also had moments of real acuity. Woodstock Nation, for example, contains a very funny account of how representatives of the Fortune 500 fastened on youth culture as a new way to move product--not to mention some rather caustic comments about the entrepreneurial backers of the Woodstock festival itself. (It is revealing to compare Hoffman's humorous, often knowing, always deeply personal writing to that of his sometime colleague Jerry Rubin, who seems to have spent the '60s cranking out one preposterous, mock-threa tening proclamation of youth revolutionary power after another.)

Hoffman's life embraced massive, tragic contradictions: The radical movement he believed was flowering in the late '60s quickly came to terms with the "establishment" Hoffman so hated. And although he himself became famous as a sort of political outlaw, his politics was always indistinct. Widely reviled by the right as chief of the cop taunters, he was also, oddly, something of an all-American--a star athlete, a scrappy street kid, a person of conscience, ingenuity, and charisma--the kind of person we are taught as schoolchildren to revere. What made it all work, at least for a little while, was Hoffman's monumental sense of humor, his world-class provocations: He tore up money on television; he showed up places with that unthinkable word "fuck" Magic Markered on his forehead; and he cofounded a joke political party whose very name is still capable of annoying the politically engaged: Yippies.

Unfortunately, one gets little sense of Abbie's complexity from Steal This Movie!, Robert Greenwald's new film biography of Hoffman, which opens nationally this month. Here all is black and white, good and bad. Although much of the dialogue is taken verbatim from Abbie's various written works, one can't help but think it would have been more apt as a biography of the strident Jerry Rubin. Likewise, the film's square, conformist, law 'n' order badmen aren't so much powers to be outmaneuvered or confronted as they are evil robots bent on repressing the fun-loving Abbie by any means necessary. They repeatedly beat him up. They spy on him and contrive nasty plots that are revealed to the audience by sinister computer printouts. One scene actually depicts these forces of malevolence as they receive their orders, standing at attention in look-alike dark suits before huge portraits of their monstrous masters, FBI director J. Edgar Hoover and Richard Nixon. Hilarious caricatures of Hoover's and Nixon's voices punctu ate the film with ee-vill. But the problem with the movie isn't that it has invented a massive conspiracy against Hoffman, purely for dramatic effect. The FBI's COINTELPRO operation, its systematic infiltration and disruption of radical groups and harassment of targeted activists (including Hoffman), is by now well documented. The problem is the way the movie depicts the conspiracy--that is, in such broad, cartoonish strokes that the true story seems to have been made up, purely for dramatic effect.