'Heart of Darkness' and late-Victorian fascination with the primitive and the double - novel by Joseph Conrad
Twentieth Century Literature, Spring, 1993 by Samir Elbarbary
A fascination with primordial darkness, the oxymoronic "fascination of the abomination" that Marlow in Heart of Darkness offers to his listeners (6), was prevalent in the late nineteenth century, reflecting a belief in man's animal origins. A perusal of the main periodicals of the period such as Nineteenth Century, Fortnightly Review, Cornhill Magazine, and Macmillan's Monthly Magazine reveals that they aimed to tell the unvarnished truth about the ugly and frightening realities of man's nature hidden behind an attractive facade. The articles published include those by R. A. Proctor, Henry Rowley, G. J. Romanes, Grant Allen, W. J. Corbett, James Sully, H. G. Wells, and Lionel Johnson."(1) Essentially, the discourse of primitivism and degeneracy reverses the idea of evolution; it deconstructs the ethos of the improving spirit of the times.
- More Articles of Interest
- Colonizers, Cannibals, and the Horror of Good Intentions in Joseph Conrad's...
- Joseph Conrad
- "Signifying nothing": Conrad's idiots and the anxiety of modernism - Joseph...
- Moral Conditions for Genocide in Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness1, The
- "Speech Was of No Use": Conrad, a New Journalism, and the Critical...
A marked premise of nineteenth-century ideology, generating more colonial rhetoric, is the superiority of the white races in the evolutionary scheme to the "primitive" or "savage."(2) Rowley's essay might well have been written as a critique of this racist vision. It states that all creatures are united in the primitive natural state, and the highest/lowest hierarchy is blurred:
Nothing more astonishes an inexperienced traveler than the discovery that in all men, differ how much so ever they may in outward circumstances or acquired habits, our race still preserves its social character; that there are the same instincts, the same natural feelings . . . with the most degraded equally with the highest. (684)
Substantially, this suggests Marlow's observation about the connection between himself and the "savages":
No, they were not inhuman. Well, you know, that was the worst of it--this suspicion of their not being inhuman. It would come slowly to one. They howled and leaped, and spun, and made horrid faces; but what thrilled you was just the thought of their humanity--like yours--the thought of your remote kinship with this wild and passionate uproar. (36-37)
Overall, Heart of Darkness offers a paradoxical reading of black and white:
It was very curious to see the contrast of expressions of the white men and of the black fellows of our crew, who were as much strangers to that part of the river as we, though their homes were only eight hundred miles away. The whites, of course greatly discomposed, had besides a curious look of being painfully shocked by such an outrageous row. The others had an alert, naturally interested expression; but their faces were essentially quiet. (41)
In this perspective, Edward Tylor argued for the unsettling of rigid hierarchical separation between races, which he ranged on a spectrum of cultural evolution. He observed that
The character and habit of mankind at once display . . . similarity and consistency of phenomena, which led the Italian proverb-maker to declare that 'all the world is one country.' . . . It appears both possible and desirable to eliminate considerations of hereditary varieties or races of man, and to treat mankind as homogeneous in nature, though placed in different grades of civilization. . . . In comparing mental and artistic culture among several peoples, the balance of good and ill is not quite easy to strike. . . . Savagery and Civilization are connected as lower and higher stages of one formation. (I: 6, 7, 28, 37)
The title of his book itself signifies that primitive people, in their communal capacities, are makers of culture--which discounts claims to cultural bias.
Many readers of the 1890s would surely agree with what Sully stated in "The Dream as a Revolution":
Psychology has of late occupied itself much with the curious phenomenon of double or alternating personality. By this is meant the recurrent interruption of the normal state by the intrusion of a secondary state, in which the thought, feelings, and the whole personality become other than they were. This occasional substitution of a new for the old self is sometimes spontaneous, the result of brain trouble. (361)
Similarly Oscar Wilde, in The Picture of Dorian Gray, sees a possibility that "we can multiply our personalities," and hence a human being can appropriate "myriad lives and myriad sensations," and Dorian tells Basil Hallward, "Each of us has Heaven and Hell in him" (142, 157). This sense of the alliance of good and evil in the psyche is evident in Bram Stoker's Dracula, when Professor Van Helsing remarks, "This evil thing is rooted deep in all good" (231), and also in Marlow's observation about Kurtz: "The pulsating stream of light, or the deceitful flow from the heart of an impenetrable darkness" (48). Madame Blavatsky is in agreement on this co-existence of contradictory selves working within the same person, as she remarks that "as flitting personalities, to-day one person, to-morrow another--we are" (85).
It is a safe assumption that the outline of this thought lies behind the efflorescence of what may be termed as neo-primitivist novels and short stories, within a few years of each other at the end of the century, by writers as varied as Robert Lewis Stevenson, Rudyard Kipling, Bram Stoker, H. G. Wells, Grant Allen, Oscar Wilde, and Henry James. Darkness is the controlling metaphor for these narratives which, in their different ways, have as their theme the phenomenon of two consciousnesses--the human "primitive" duality (the idea of the secret sharer is of vital concern for Conrad) and the interconnectedness of genius and insanity. Titles such as The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, "The Mark of the Beast," Dracula, The Invisible Man, The British Barbarians, "The Beast in the Jungle" would not be in the least out of place in any one of the above-mentioned journals. My approach to Heart of Darkness is by way of such texts, as it displays sufficient affinities to them. The "dark" Kurtz, although drawn in much darker colors, is not an uneasy ally of the predatory Moreau, Dracula, and Hyde--all are mad and savage geniuses. Yet it must be said that while Heart of Darkness works with well-nigh common materials, it manages to be highly esteemed for its far more rich and complex rendering of the darkness theme, and remains a brilliant work anticipating modernist techniques which appeal to the modern sensibility.