Before Going to Medical School. - Review - book review
Judaism, Wntr, 1999 by Lawrence Zaroff
The Jewish Doctor: A Narrative History. By MICHAEL NEVINS. Northvail, NJ: Jason Aronson, 1996.
When I asked Wendy, my daughter the gastroenterologist, and my son Jon, the cardiologist, how much they knew of the history of Jewish doctors, the returning answer, even for e-mail, was swift and short: "we probably know as little as you did before reading Michael Nevins's collection of vignettes, The Jewish Doctor. "As a physician and a jew I was immediately overwhelmed with guilt. I was, however, able to excuse myself to myself and to Wendy and Jon, by pointing out that I, like them, never had time to pursue the literature and history of Jewish medicine.
But now we have available in one small volume an attractive book, clearly written, and quickly read, that provides a brief introduction to Jewish medical history and a good collection of references for future investigation. What every Jewish mother and father might want their son and daughter to know before going to medical school could be considered a theme of Nevins's book. In truth, rather than appealing only to Jewish doctors and their families, this book will ignite the curiosity of any reader with an interest in Jewish history or general medical history.
Understand though that this book is not a single "Narrative History," despite its title, nor a specialized discourse with a central argument clearly delineated and supported through analysis of primary sources. Judging from the title, one expects Nevins to confront and answer the issue that he raises in the "Introduction," namely, do "Jews truly have a unique aptitude for medicine?" (xii). This, after all, would make it a signal contribution--but he does not tackle the thorny general questions this might involve. He does not explore aspects of Jewish culture that perhaps prepared Jews-or perhaps not-for turning abstract science into applied practice. He has more to say about Jewish ethical traditions that perhaps-or perhaps not--helped to shape medical practice in the last five decades. Neither does Nevins give us definitions: Is a Jew a Jew because he is born so despite becoming a "converso" or a marrano, outwardly Christian but observing Jewish traditions? Does he consider doctors who are ostensibly Jewish in name and birth but do not practice their religion still "Jewish Doctors"? Can a Jewish feldsher (a communal paramedic) or a basic scientist be considered a "Jewish Doctor" as he implies?
Nevins himself forewarns the reader. A practicing internist, Dr. Nevins has produced instead what he offers in his introduction: an "eclectic collection [that] is not intended to provide a comprehensive review of every aspect of Jewish medical history." Tenuously connected chronologically, the twenty-one short chapters carry the reader through a number of the cardinal events of medical practice and progress from biblical times into the twentieth century, while focusing on the lives of Jewish doctors.
While the brevity of each chapter leaves the reader wishing for more information, especially in "Women in Medical Practice" and "Shtetl Medicine," the accounts tantalize one sufficiently to turn to the well-organized citations in search of sources for further reading. A few segments, however, sorely need either a much more comprehensive examination or should have been left out entirely. One is the unit "Defensive Medicine," three and a half pages describing De Pomis and De Castro, two physicians who wrote against the antisemitic slander of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Similarly "The Jewish Doctor in Literature," a chapter that mentions Israel Singer's novel The Family Carnovsky, Sinclair Lewis's Arrowsmith, and Green's The Last Angry Man, could have been enriched and enlarged by including the prose and the poetry of Jewish doctors.
After the opening chapter of twelve pages (the longest, "An Historical Perspective"), the majority of each of the other chapters are about four pages, the topics ranging from the mandatory "Maimonides," who thought chicken soup to be a good medicine, to the last, a whimsical epilogue on "Bagels and Bankes" (cupping, an ancient medical procedure). Although at times even Ariadne might get lost, I find two threads that do seem loosely to connect the book: why Jews chose the medical profession in relatively large numbers is the first general discourse that cuts across time and chapter; the second, discussed in the "Introduction" as well as in several other segments, examines the difficulties Jews confronted in entering and working in the medical profession.
Any Jew reading the Talmud could have been drawn to medicine on encountering the large number of laws relating to medical practice, 213 of 613, whose "principal concern ... was that the physician should act in accordance with God's will in order to maintain the patient's welfare" (1--2). Chapter Two, "Early Jewish Opinions of Physicians," emphasizes the importance of medicine to the Jewish faith, and Nevins here points out the central concept of "Pikuach Nefesh": in order to save a life even for a very brief time all other holy laws except unchastity, idolatry, and the shedding of blood unjustly can be ignored (13--14). Furthermore despite the "tension between science and religion [that] has characterized much of Jewish history... [and] although the Talmud had acknowledged that disease and its cure ultimately are in the hands of God, physicians were understood to have a legitimate role as God's agents and, therefore, they were esteemed" (14--15).
Most Recent Reference Articles
Most Recent Reference Publications
Most Popular Reference Articles
Most Popular Reference Publications
Content provided in partnership with http://findarticles.com/source//

