If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them? - Original Research

Journal of Family Practice, July, 2002 by Glenn A. Loomis, J. Scott Ries, Robert M. Saywell, Jr, Nitesh R. Thakker

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS * This study was undertaken as part of the faculty development fellowship at the University of North Carolina Department of Family Medicine and funded by the Bureau of Health Professions grant no. HRSA#1-D14-HP00019. We thank the Indiana Academy of Family Physicians, St Francis Family Practice Residency, Indiana University Department of Family Medicine, Bowen Research Center. UNC Faculty Development Fellowship 2000-2001 fellows, Nancy Loomis, and Jenny Kirby for their support.

REFERENCES

(1.) McDonald CJ. The barriers to electronic medical record systems and how to overcome them. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; 4:213-21.

(2.) Wager KA, SM Ornstein, Jenkins RG. Perceived value of computer-based patient records among clinician users MD Comput 1997; 14:334-6, 338, 340.

(3.) Wager KA, Lee FW, White AW, Ward DM, Ornstein SM. Impact of an electronic medical record system on community-based primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Pract 2000; 13:338-48.

(4.) Spann SJ. Should the complete medical record lie computerized in family practice? An affirmative view. J Fam Pract 1990; 30:457-60.

(5.) Ornstein SM. Electronic medical records in family practice: the time is now, J Fam Pract 1997; 44:45-8.

(6.) Rodnick JE. Should the complete medical record be computerized in family practice? An opposing view. J Fam Pract 1990; 30:461-4.

(7.) Dick RS. The Institute of Medicine's patient record study and its implications for record administrators. Top Health Rec Manage 1991; 11:67-72.

(8.) Swanson T, Dostal J, Eichhorst B, Jernigan C, Knox M, Roper K. Recent implementations of electronic medical records in four family practice residency programs. Acad Med 1997:72:607-12.

(9.) Woodward B The computer-based patient record and confidentiality. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:1419-22.

(10.) Wager KA, Heda S, Austin CJ. Developing a health information net work within an integrated delivery system: a case study. Top Health Inf Manage 1997; 17:20-31.

(11.) Strasberg HR, Tudiver F, Holbrook AM, Geiger G, Keshavjee KK, Troyan S. Moving towards an electronic patient record: a survey to assess the needs of community family physicians. Proc AMIA Symp 1998:230-4.

(12.) Smith WR, Zastrow R. User requirements for the computerized patient record: physician opinions. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994:994.

(13.) Powsner SM, Wyatt JC, Wright P. Opportunities for and challenges of computerisation. Lancet 1998; 352:161-22.

(14.) Musham C, Orstein SM, Jenkins RG. Family practice educators' perceptions of computer-based patient records. Fam Med 1995; 27:571-5.

(15.) Arias-Vimarlund V, Ljungglen M, Timpka T. Implementation of computer-based patient records in primary care: the societal health economic effects. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1996:503-7.

(16.) Lawler F, Cacy JR, Viviani N, Hamm RM, Cobb SW. Implementation and termination of a computerized medical information system. J Fam Pract 1996; 42:233-6.

(17.) Lindberg DA, Humpreys BL. Medical informatics. JAMA 1996; 275:1821-2.

(18.) Levitt JI. Why physicians continue to reject the computerized medical record. Minn Med 1994; 7(8):17-21.


 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with Thompson Gale