Improving Delivery of Preventive Health Care with the Comprehensive Annotated Reminder Tool - CART - Statistical Data Included

Journal of Family Practice, Sept, 2001 by Kevin C. Shannon, James M. Sinacore, Stephen G. Bennett, Amit M. Joshi, Kevin M. Sherin, Allen Deitrich

KEY POINTS FOR CLINICIANS

* The Comprehensive Annotated Reminder Tool
(CART) provides immediate visual access to
essential details of preventive services guidelines,
improving health provider accuracy.

* Use of the CART for the history and physical
examination resulted in a substantial increase in
the appropriateness of the preventive services
provided.

* The effect was temporary and was not due to
increased knowledge.

* OBJECTIVE We assessed the effect of the Comprehensive Annotated Reminder Tool (CART) on physician adherence to preventive services recommendations.

* STUDY DESIGN Using a randomized pretest/posttest control group design, we assigned physicians to the CART group or the control group, followed up prospectively, and evaluated for appropriate adherence to guidelines. The 3 age-specific versions of the CART annotated history and physical examination form contained up to 49 preventive services recommendations.

* POPULATION All resident physicians in a large family practice residency program were studied over the course of 1 academic year.

* OUTCOMES MEASURED We performed blinded chart reviews to assess the appropriateness of preventive services ordered by the physicians before the introduction of the CART, during its use, and after its removal. A multiple-choice test completed before and after the use of the CART forms assessed knowledge.

* RESULTS When the CART was used, the appropriateness of physician preventive behavior increased by 21% overall. The appropriateness of history, physical examination, and laboratory interventions increased by 33%. When the CART was removed, physician behavior returned to baseline (P [is less than or equal to] .0025 for 16 of 20 interventions). No significant differences were observed in the control group over time. Knowledge increased during the study period for all physicians (P [is less than] .005) but did not differ significantly between the treatment and control groups (P=.608).

* CONCLUSIONS Use of the CART significantly improved physician performance in the appropriate delivery of preventive care.

* KEYWORDS Primary health care; preventive health services. (J Fam Pract 2001; 50:767-771.)

Frame and Carlson[1] published a critical review of periodic health screenings in The Journal of Family Practice in 1975. Such efforts, currently manifested in the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), have had a profound impact on the practice of family physicians. Increased oversight of family physicians' preventive practices by third parties and the increased medical sophistication of the public have fueled demand for preventive health services. Family physicians are experiencing increased accountability to their patients and communities for the effective delivery of preventive medical care.[2-4]

A number of systems have been developed to assist physicians with the implementation of evidence-based preventive services guidelines. Over the past 15 years, numerous researchers have studied the effects of interventions using flow charts,[5-7] checklists,[8] computer-based reminders,[9-14] and educational programs[15-19] for delivery of preventive services. Ornstein and colleagues[10] found that the use of a computer-based tracking and reminder system for preventive services, together with a physician education program, modestly increased the frequency of counseling and screening services for patients. Similarly, Cheney and Ramsdell[8] found that physicians who received an age- and sex-specific checklist in their patients' medical charts performed significantly more age- and sex-appropriate preventive services than control physicians. But physician compliance with screening tools is often a problem.[6] In the Cheney and Ramsdell study, only 39% of physicians used the available checklist to screen patients. Another study[14] found a greater percentage of appropriate health screens by physicians using computerized reminders. However, many physicians did not make use of the available resource. Some studies found only minimal increases in screening rates with interventions such as educational seminars.[19] One study[5] used a simple flow sheet to analyze appropriate health service needs and noted that their results suggest that a flow sheet, although helpful, is not enough. Indeed, accomplishing sustained improvement in preventive services clinical outcomes is a complex process.[20]

We investigated the effect of combining a complete set of annotated recommendations with a history and physical examination form on the rate of appropriate application of preventive service recommendations. We suspected that busy practitioners would need preventive services guidelines available at the point of care to be able to adhere closely, so we created a form that is very user-friendly. We also studied the effect of removing the screening tool after the intervention, to evaluate whether the behavioral effect was due to education or to the presence of the chart tool, a question that has not been resolved in several previous studies.


 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here

Content provided in partnership with Thompson Gale