Beneficiary Survey-Based Feedback on New Medicare Informational Materials
Table 1
Sources of Medicare-Related Information Received
Beneficiary
Source Experienced New
Percent
Any Medicare Information
Received During Last 6 Months 71.0 87.6
Medicare-Related Information
Received
AARP 7.1 14.2
Church, Synagogue, or Mosque 0.2 0.1
Counseling Agency 0.7 0.7
Doctor or Other Health Care
Professional 1.9 2.0
Employer 1.5 3.0
Insurance Company, Agent, or
Health Plan (1) 32.6 (1) 50.5
Mail or Telephone (3) 14.2 (2) 23.2
Medicare Program 4.2 13.2
Radio/Television (2) 25.8 (3) 19.8
Social Security Administration 1.4 7.9
State Department of Insurance
or Health 1.9 2.2
Other/Don't Know 2.1 2.8
(1) Indicates the most informative source according
to beneficiaries.
(2) Indicates the second most informative source
according to beneficiaries.
(3) Indicates the third most informative source
according to beneficiaries.
NOTE: Includes experienced beneficiaries aged 65 or over and
new beneficiaries just aging into the Medicare program.
SOURCE: Survey of new and experienced Medicare beneficiaries in the
Kansas City metropolitan statistical area conducted by Research
Triangle Institute between September 1998 and January 1999.
Table 2
Time Spent Looking at the Materials
Beneficiary
Experienced
Handbook
and
Time Spent Bulletin Handbook CAHPS[R]
Less than 15 Minutes 27.6 11.0 32.1
15-30 Minutes 50.7 29.8 38.9
15-60 Minutes 12.9 30.5 19.8
More than 60 Minutes 8.8 28.7 9.2
Beneficiary
New
Handbook
and
Time Spent Bulletin Handbook CAHPS[R]
Less than 15 Minutes 34.5 9.8 32.7
15-30 Minutes 47.2 31.2 41.7
15-60 Minutes 14.8 31.5 14.3
More than 60 Minutes 3.5 27.4 11.3
NOTES: CAHPS[R] is Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.
Time spent is shown for those who received each intervention.
Includes experienced beneficiaries aged 65 or over and new
beneficiaries just aging into the Medicare program.
SOURCE: Survey of new and experienced Medicare beneficiaries in the
Kansas City metropolitan statistical area conducted by Research
Triangle Institute between September 1998 and January 1999.
Table 3
Helpfulness of the Materials in Understanding Advantages
and Disadvantages of Different Medicare
Health Insurance Options (1)
Helpfulness
Very Good/
Education Poor/Fair Good Excellent
Percent
Less than 12 Years 16.9 56.6 26.5
High School Graduate 19.0 44.2 36.8
Some College/Technical School 14.3 42.8 43.0
College Graduate 7.5 46.9 45.7
(1) Includes only experienced beneficiaries 65 years of age or over.
NOTE: Differences between educational groups are
significant at the 0.05 level.
SOURCE: Survey of new and experienced Medicare beneficiaries in the
Kansas City metropolitan statistical area conducted by Research
Triangle Institute between September 1998 and January 1999.
Table 4
Logistic Regression Results Predicting the
Probability of Finding the Materials Useful
Beneficiaries
Experienced (1) New (2)
beta(se) beta(se)
Independent Variable (n = 732) (n = 779)
Intercept -1.8856(1.1580) 0.6047(1.4898)
Study Group
Bulletin *** 0.7485(0.2498) *** 0.8689 (0.2825)
Handbook *** 0.5392(0.2517) *** 0.7775 (0.2759)
Handbook and CAHPS[R] *** 0.6765(0.2470) * 0.5099 (0.2675)
Age
65-74 Years 0.0524(0.0322) NA
75 Years or Over ** -0.0722(0.0332)
Sex
Male NS * 0.4009 (0.2138)
Income
More than $30,000 a Year ** -0.7640 (0.3617) NS
Supplemental Insurance
Individually-Purchased NS *** 0.6822 (0.2230)
Spouse's Choice
Affects Respondent's Choice ** 0.3987(0.2011) * 0.3955 (0.2270)
Physicians Visits
3 or More Physicians Visits
in the Last 3 Months * -0.4366(0.2606) NS
Regular Source of Care
Have a Usual Source of Care NS * -0.7729 (0.4401)
Exposure to Other
Information Sources
(Range=0-11) ** 0.2223(0.1033) *** 0.2800 (0.1142)
Exposure to Quality of
Care Information * 0.5206(0.3125) NA
15-Item Knowledge Index *** 1.9875(0.5785) *** 3.4982 (0.5828)
Negative Attitude about
HMOs ** -0.4475(0.1844 ** -0.5367 (0.2134)
*** p < 0.01.
** 0.01 p < 0.05.
* 0.05 p < 0.10.
(1) n = 732.
(2) n = 779.
NOTES: CAHPS [R] is Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.
NA is not applicable. NS is not significant. HMOs is health maintenance
organizations. The regression models also included variables reflecting
beneficiary race, ethnicity, education, whether the beneficiary lives
alone, was hospitalized in the last year, and health status as measured
by the Standard Form-12[R]. Includes experienced beneficiaries aged 65
and over and new beneficiaries just aging into the Medicare program.
SOURCE: Survey of new and experienced Medicare beneficiaries in the
Kansas City metropolitan statistical area conducted by Research
Triangle Institute between September 1998 and January 1999.
Table 5
Predicted Probability of Finding the Intervention
Materials Useful, by Study Group
Study Group Beneficiary
Experienced New
Control 0.605 0.716
Bulletin 0.751 0.842
Handbook 0.714 0.831
Handbook and CAHPS[R] 0.739 0.796
NOTES: CAHPS[R] is Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.
Includes experienced beneficiaries aged 65 or over and new
beneficiaries just aging into the Medicare program.
SOURCE: Survey of new and experienced Medicare beneficiaries in
the Kansas City metropolitan statistical area conducted by Research
Triangle Institute between September 1998 and January 1999.
Most RecentHealth Care Articles