Health Care Industry
Industry: Email Alert RSS FeedGood quality care increases hospital profits under prospective payment
Health Care Financing Review, Spring, 1992 by David C. Hsia, Cathaleen A. Ahern
Under this analysis, a DRG sequence of increasing diagnostic specificity may increase profits. Conversely, skimping on medically indicated services maximizes hospital profits in other DRG sequences. This article gauges which trend has the greater economic effect. Overall, does prospective payment reward or penalize good quality care? Obviously, multiple factors influence medical workup and treatment decisions. In this article, we consider only the economic [TABULAR DATA OMITTED]
consequences of poor quality. Non-economic behaviors such as altruism, professionalism, or fear of malpractice litigation are not measured in this study.
Methods
Most RecentHealth Care Articles
The National DRG Validation Study employed a stratified two-stage sample design based on hospitals and discharges (Delaney, 1987). In the first stage, the Office of Inspector General (OIG), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, used simple random sampling without replacement to select 80 hospitals from each of three bed-size strata: hospitals with fewer than 100 beds, 100 to 299 beds, and 300 beds or more. If quality of care varied by hospital size, as expected, this stratification maximized the statistical information. The design excluded specialty institutions (e.g., pediatric, rehabilitation, and psychiatric hospitals), facilities in States not using Federal prospective payment during the period studied (i.e., New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Maryland), and hospitals not contributing data to the calculation of the initial relative weights assigned to DRGs. One sample hospital terminated its Medicare eligibility between the study period and actual collection of medical records, leaving a first-stage sample of 239 from a population of 4,913 acute care hospitals (Table 3).
The second stage used systemic random sampling to select up to 30 Medicare discharges (including patients who transferred to other hospitals or died) from each of the 239 hospitals for the first half of Federal fiscal year 1985: October 1, 1984 to March 31, 1985. If the hospital had fewer than 30 such discharges during this period, the sample selected all available discharges. OIG then requested a complete copy of each of the 7,076 selected medical records. With careful followup and selective use of subpoenas, it ultimately obtained 7,050 charts (99.6 percent) representing 6,900 different patients. Comparison of the records' demographic characteristics demonstrated that the sample accurately represented the population of all Medicare beneficiaries in PPS jurisdictions (Hsia, 1988).
OIG contracted with the Baxter-Health Data Institute of Lexington, Massachusetts for registered records analysts and accredited records technicians to perform a blinded reabstraction of the ICD-9-CM disease codes supported by the chart (Ahern, 1988). In addition, specially trained registered nurses screened each record for quality of care using the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol, a chart audit instrument of [TABULAR DATA OMITTED]
proven utility (Siu, 1986). Cases failing quality screening underwent judgmental review by contractor physicians using implicit criteria to identify care clearly failing to meet "professionally recognized standards," the statutory criterion for peer review organizations (United States Code, 1989). The reviewing physicians had instructions to ignore borderline problems or legitimate differences in medical judgment as to appropriate management (Delaney and Hsia, 1987).
Brought to you by CBS MoneyWatch.com
- Best- and Worst-Paid College Degrees
- 6 Things You Should Never Do on Twitter or Facebook
- How Much Sleep Do You Really Need?
- 6 Big Myths about Gas Mileage
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Health Articles
Most Recent Health Publications
Most Popular Health Articles
- Make running easier: with this unique 'pose running' technique, you'll learn to actually enjoy your fat-burning sessions
- 50 home remedies that work: these safe, fast, and effective fixes will relieve what ails you - Cover Story
- Detox in 7 days: a detoux diet can help you shed up to 10 pounds and leave you feeling terrific. Our weeklong plan shows you how to lose the weight and keep it off - Cover story
- Treat sinusitis naturally: breath easy and relieve sinus pressure with these remedies - Quick Fixes and Long-Term Solutions
- All about nightshades: explore the hidden hazards of your favorite food with macrobiotic nutritionist Lino Stanchich


