advertisement
On ZDNet: How blogging saved my life and $100,000
Find Articles in:
all
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Sports
Health
Autos
Arts
Home & Garden

Featured Download

Speak Like a CEO

This chapter describes ten helpful actions and behaviors that will bring you...

advertisement

Content provided in partnership with
Thomson / Gale

Bullying in school: are short pupils at risk? Questionnaire study in a cohort

British Medical Journal,  March 4, 2000  by Linda D Voss,  Jean Mulligan

Bullying is still prevalent in schools and is clearly stressrial for victims.[1,2] It may also have undesirable consequences for bullies, with antisocial behaviour persisting into adulthood. Victims are generally reported to be weaker than the bullies.[2,3] This would suggest that very short pupils are more likely to be victims and less likely to be the aggressors. The Wessex growth study allowed us to examine the prevalence of bullying, as experienced or perpetrated by pupils of different heights.

Subjects, methods, and results

Ninety two short normal adolescents who had been below the third centile for height at school entry[4] and 117 controls matched for age and sex completed a bullying questionnaire, derived from work by Whitney and Smith.[5] There were no refusals or any significant differences in sex or social class between the groups. Mean age (range) was 14.7 (13.4-15.7) years. Mean height SD scores were: short pupils -1.90 (-3.53 to -0.01), controls 0.31 (-1.41 to 2.15). Additional data on bullying, collected the previous year, were available from teachers' written reports and parental interviews.

The table summarises the data. More short pupils than controls claimed to have been bullied at some time in secondary school. This difference remained significant after logistic regression controlled for social class. Short boys were more than twice as likely as control boys to be victims and much more likely than control boys to say that bullying upset them. Significantly more short pupils than controls said that bullying had started in junior school. Short pupils had as many good friends as did controls (72/92 (78%) [Nu] 95/117 (81%)), but significantly more spent break time alone at least once a week (9/92 (10%) [Nu] 2/117 (2%), P=0.032). In many cases bullying had stopped, but significantly more short pupils than controls, regardless of sex, reported current bullying.

Numbers of victims of bullying and bullies among short pupils and controls of average stature (pupils', parents', and teachers' reports). Figures are numbers (percentages) of respondents

                           Short        Controls
                        pupils (n=92)    (n=117)    P value
Pupils' report

Victim of bullying in secondary school:
  Total                   42 (46)       30 (26)     0.003(**)
  Boys                    25 (46)       13 (21)     0.005(**)
  Girls                   17 (45)       17 (32)     0.273
Bullied in both junior and secondary schools:
  Total                   24 (26)       13 (11)     0.018(*)
  Boys                    14 (26)        4 (7)      0.013(*)
  Girls                   10 (26)        9 (17)     0.526
Bullying currently
  occurring:
  Total                   21 (23)        4 (4)     <0.001(**)
  Boys                    11 (21)        2 (3)      0.006(**)
  Girls                   10 (26)        2 (4)      0.003(**)
Upset when bullied:
  Total                   31 (76)       16 (55)     0.120
  Boys                    17 (71)        3 (25)     0.014(*)
  Girls                   14 (82)       13 (77)     1.000
Parents' report             n=88        n=116
Victim of bullying in secondary school:
  Total                   37 (43)       44 (38)     0.605
  Boys                    24 (46)       25 (39)     0.562
  Girls                   13 (37)       19 (37)     1.000
Teachers' report            n=84        n=103
Victim of bullying in secondary school:
  Total                   31 (37)       23 (23)     0.047(*)
  Boys                    17 (36)       12 (23)     0.227
  Girls                   14 (38)       11 (22)     0.169
Bullies others in secondary school:
  Total                   13 (16)       16 (16)     1.000
  Boys                     6 (13)       13 (25)     0.234
  Girls                    7 (18)        3 (6)      0.093

(*) P<0.05, (**) P<0.01 ([chi square] test).

Teachers also reported that significantly more short pupils than controls were victims of bullying. Parents reported more bullying, generally, than either teachers or pupils, and parents of controls were as likely as parents of short children to say that their children were bullied. According to teachers, bullies were to be found in both height groups, but whereas significantly fewer control girls than control boys were bullies, short girls were as likely to be bullies as both short and control boys.

Comment

This report suggests that short children are more likely to be bullied than their taller peers. More short pupils also report a degree of social isolation--the result, or possibly even the cause, of their victimisation. These data are important since the Wessex growth study has previously found few significant psychosocial problems that could be attributed to short stature. The data need, however, to be interpreted with caution: it is possible that shorter pupils are simply more likely to mistake the normal rough and tumble in the playground for bullying. The data could also be accounted for by the fact that significantly fewer control than short boys admitted to being bullied. Even when they did, few confessed to being upset.