Featured Download
Speak Like a CEO
This chapter describes ten helpful actions and behaviors that will bring you...
Health Care Industry
Industry: Email Alert RSS FeedBullying in school: are short pupils at risk? Questionnaire study in a cohort
British Medical Journal, March 4, 2000 by Linda D Voss, Jean Mulligan
Bullying is still prevalent in schools and is clearly stressrial for victims.[1,2] It may also have undesirable consequences for bullies, with antisocial behaviour persisting into adulthood. Victims are generally reported to be weaker than the bullies.[2,3] This would suggest that very short pupils are more likely to be victims and less likely to be the aggressors. The Wessex growth study allowed us to examine the prevalence of bullying, as experienced or perpetrated by pupils of different heights.
Subjects, methods, and results
Ninety two short normal adolescents who had been below the third centile for height at school entry[4] and 117 controls matched for age and sex completed a bullying questionnaire, derived from work by Whitney and Smith.[5] There were no refusals or any significant differences in sex or social class between the groups. Mean age (range) was 14.7 (13.4-15.7) years. Mean height SD scores were: short pupils -1.90 (-3.53 to -0.01), controls 0.31 (-1.41 to 2.15). Additional data on bullying, collected the previous year, were available from teachers' written reports and parental interviews.
The table summarises the data. More short pupils than controls claimed to have been bullied at some time in secondary school. This difference remained significant after logistic regression controlled for social class. Short boys were more than twice as likely as control boys to be victims and much more likely than control boys to say that bullying upset them. Significantly more short pupils than controls said that bullying had started in junior school. Short pupils had as many good friends as did controls (72/92 (78%) [Nu] 95/117 (81%)), but significantly more spent break time alone at least once a week (9/92 (10%) [Nu] 2/117 (2%), P=0.032). In many cases bullying had stopped, but significantly more short pupils than controls, regardless of sex, reported current bullying.
Numbers of victims of bullying and bullies among short pupils and controls of average stature (pupils', parents', and teachers' reports). Figures are numbers (percentages) of respondents
Short Controls
pupils (n=92) (n=117) P value
Pupils' report
Victim of bullying in secondary school:
Total 42 (46) 30 (26) 0.003(**)
Boys 25 (46) 13 (21) 0.005(**)
Girls 17 (45) 17 (32) 0.273
Bullied in both junior and secondary schools:
Total 24 (26) 13 (11) 0.018(*)
Boys 14 (26) 4 (7) 0.013(*)
Girls 10 (26) 9 (17) 0.526
Bullying currently
occurring:
Total 21 (23) 4 (4) <0.001(**)
Boys 11 (21) 2 (3) 0.006(**)
Girls 10 (26) 2 (4) 0.003(**)
Upset when bullied:
Total 31 (76) 16 (55) 0.120
Boys 17 (71) 3 (25) 0.014(*)
Girls 14 (82) 13 (77) 1.000
Parents' report n=88 n=116
Victim of bullying in secondary school:
Total 37 (43) 44 (38) 0.605
Boys 24 (46) 25 (39) 0.562
Girls 13 (37) 19 (37) 1.000
Teachers' report n=84 n=103
Victim of bullying in secondary school:
Total 31 (37) 23 (23) 0.047(*)
Boys 17 (36) 12 (23) 0.227
Girls 14 (38) 11 (22) 0.169
Bullies others in secondary school:
Total 13 (16) 16 (16) 1.000
Boys 6 (13) 13 (25) 0.234
Girls 7 (18) 3 (6) 0.093
(*) P<0.05, (**) P<0.01 ([chi square] test).
Teachers also reported that significantly more short pupils than controls were victims of bullying. Parents reported more bullying, generally, than either teachers or pupils, and parents of controls were as likely as parents of short children to say that their children were bullied. According to teachers, bullies were to be found in both height groups, but whereas significantly fewer control girls than control boys were bullies, short girls were as likely to be bullies as both short and control boys.
Comment
This report suggests that short children are more likely to be bullied than their taller peers. More short pupils also report a degree of social isolation--the result, or possibly even the cause, of their victimisation. These data are important since the Wessex growth study has previously found few significant psychosocial problems that could be attributed to short stature. The data need, however, to be interpreted with caution: it is possible that shorter pupils are simply more likely to mistake the normal rough and tumble in the playground for bullying. The data could also be accounted for by the fact that significantly fewer control than short boys admitted to being bullied. Even when they did, few confessed to being upset.