Health Care Industry
Industry: Email Alert RSS FeedImplications of applying widely accepted cholesterol screening and management guidelines to a British adult population: cross sectional study of cardiovascular disease and risk factors
British Medical Journal, Oct 24, 1998 by Nigel Unwin, Richard Thomson, Ann Marie O'Byrne, Mike Laker, Heather Armstrong
Introduction
Considerable attention has been focused recently on promoting evidence based practice and the potential of guidelines to inform and support appropriate care and changes in clinical behaviour.(1-3] Guidelines have been drawn up on the prevention of coronary heart disease--in particular, on the screening and management of patients with lipid disorders. Guidance on the use of statins, based on the Sheffield table,[4] was recently circulated to all doctors in the United Kingdom.[5] There are important differences in the recommendations of the major guidelines, however, yet neither these differences nor the implications for clinical practice have been studied.
Most RecentHealth Care Articles
We have applied data from a population based survey to the different guidelines for a population aged 25-64 years.[6] We aimed to describe the potential implications of differences in commonly available and widely promoted guidelines produced by the British Hyperlipidaemia Association,[7] the British Drugs and Therapeutics Bulletin[8] the European Atherosclerosis Society,[9] and the American national cholesterol education program.[10]
Methods
Recruitment and data collection
The data used in this paper are from the Newcastle heart project--a population based study of coronary heart disease, diabetes, and associated risk factors in the general (predominantly of European origin), Chinese, and South Asian populations of Newcastle upon Tyne.[6] We have used data from the general population for this paper. This was a population based sample from the patient register of the Newcastle Family Health Services Authority, the list of all individuals in Newcastle registered with a general practitioner. We took an age and sex stratified random sample of those aged 25 to 64 years after removing any Chinese sounding names (less than 0.5% of the sample).[11]
Lipid analyses
Subjects were recruited to the study between April 1993 and November 1994. After overnight fasting, subjects' height and weight were measured, their body mass index (kg/[m.sup.2]) was computed, and a fasting blood sample was taken. Until May 1994 the lipid analyses were performed on a Cobas Bio centrifugal analyser (Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City) and after this date a DAX analyser was used (Bayer plc, Basingstoke). Throughout the study period, the laboratory participated in an external quality assurance scheme. This showed no changes in bias (inaccuracy) for cholesterol or high density lipoprotein cholesterol. However, the data for triglycerides confirmed that the DAX data showed a positive bias relative to the Cobas Bio data and therefore results obtained with the DAX were adjusted as previously described.[12] The low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration was calculated using the Friedewald formula.[7]
Cardiovascular data
Subjects had two blood pressure measurements. These were made by trained observers using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer with an alternate size cuff.[13] A 12 lead electrocardiogram was recorded with the subjects at rest. The findings were coded according to the Minnesota manual by two independent observers; a third observer was used where the two disagreed.[14] Each subject completed a questionnaire, which included items on diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, and stroke (all diagnosed by a doctor); smoking status; causes of death in any parents or siblings who had died; and the World Health Organisation questionnaire on intermittent claudication.[15] For women, the questionnaire also inquired about age at the time of the menopause, and any factors affecting its onset. Local ethical committee approval was received for the study and all subjects gave informed consent before participating.
Applying the guidelines
Space does not permit a detailed description of the guidelines. Here, we have focused on the people for whom the guidelines recommend intensive treatment in the form of rigorous dietary intervention under-pinned by professional dietetic advice, with or without drug treatment. Table 1 summarises how we applied each of the guidelines to the data. The European Atherosclerosis Society and national cholesterol education program guidelines specify two target levels for active intervention: one for drug treatment (if a trial of dietary intervention fails) and the other for intensive dietary intervention only. Table 2 gives the definitions of the different conditions and risk factors we used in applying the guidelines to the study population.
Table 1 Application of guidelines to data(*)
Population to be screened Population to be treated
British Hyperlipidaemia
Association
In order of priority: Presence of coronary heart
disease and LDL cholesterol
>3.4 mmol/l
Vascular disease Presence of [is greater than or
equal to] 2 out of: diabetes,
hypertension (1)(*), current
smoker, or obesity and LDL
cholesterol >5.0 mmol/l
Family history (1)(*) Male sex and LDL cholesterol
of coronary >6.0 mmol/l
heart disease
Diabetes, hypertension Female sex, postmenopausal,
(1)(*), current smoker, and LDL cholesterol
or obesity >6.0 mmol/l
Drugs and Therapeutics
Bulletin
Vascular disease, or a Presence of vascular disease
family history (1)(*) and LDL cholesterol [is greater
of coronary heart than or equal to] 3.4 mmol/l
disease; or
Particular combination If no overt vascular disease,
of age, sex, hypertension decision from table based
(1)(*), left ventricular on combination of age, sex,
hypertrophy, smoking, and diabetes, smoking,
diabetes from risk table hypertension (1)(*), left
ventricular hypertrophy,
and total cholesterol value
European Atherosclerosis
Association
All Presence of vascular
disease and total
cholesterol >5 mmol/l
(<6 mmol/l dietary
therapy only)
Coronary heart disease risk >20%
over 10 years (determined by
risk chart according to age,
sex, smoking status, blood
pressure, and total cholesterol)
and total cholesterol
>5 mmol/l (<7 mmol/l dietary
therapy only)
Coronary heart disease
risk [is less than or
equal to] 20% and total
cholesterol >7 mmol/l
(<8 mmol/l dietary
therapy only)
National cholesterol
education programme
All Presence of coronary heart
disease and LDL cholesterol
[is greater than or equal to]
2.6 mmol/l (<3.4 mmol/l
dietary therapy only)
LDL cholesterol [is greater
than or equal to] 3.4 mmol/l
(<4.1 mmol/l dietary therapy
only) and presence of [is
greater than or equal to] 2
(3 if HDL cholesterol
[is greater than or
equal to] 1.6 mmol/l) out of:
male, age [is greater than
or equal to] 45, diabetes,
hypertension (2)(*), current
smoker, postmenopausal female,
family history of coronary
heart disease (2)(*), HDL
cholesterol <0.9mmol/l
LDL cholesterol [is greater
than or equal to] 4.1 mmol/l
(<4.9 mmol/l dietary
therapy only) with
<2 risk factors
Brought to you by CBS MoneyWatch.com
- Best- and Worst-Paid College Degrees
- 6 Things You Should Never Do on Twitter or Facebook
- How Much Sleep Do You Really Need?
- 6 Big Myths about Gas Mileage
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn’t Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Health Articles
Most Recent Health Publications
Most Popular Health Articles
- Make running easier: with this unique 'pose running' technique, you'll learn to actually enjoy your fat-burning sessions
- 50 home remedies that work: these safe, fast, and effective fixes will relieve what ails you - Cover Story
- Detox in 7 days: a detoux diet can help you shed up to 10 pounds and leave you feeling terrific. Our weeklong plan shows you how to lose the weight and keep it off - Cover story
- Treat sinusitis naturally: breath easy and relieve sinus pressure with these remedies - Quick Fixes and Long-Term Solutions
- All about nightshades: explore the hidden hazards of your favorite food with macrobiotic nutritionist Lino Stanchich


