Financial Services Industry
Industry: Email Alert RSS FeedDecoding the risk multiple: whether it's a happy event such as the birth of quadruplets to an employee or the kind of unhappy incident that inflicts multiple injuries—perhaps a hotel fire at a conference or a shuttle-bus accident involving several employees—managing exposure to multiple medical claims is a rising concern
Risk & Insurance, Oct 1, 2005 by Michelle Fallahi
Several trends are coming together in the healthcare insurance industry that could result in significant, unexpected exposure and losses for health plans, and potentially higher health insurance premiums for employers.
This risk comes in the form of multiple claims arising from a single incident. While each claim may not exceed a health plan's retention level for reinsurance, the combined claims could easily go over this retention, yet still not be eligible for reinsurance. That's because excess reinsurance programs are designed to protect the health plan in ease an individual claim exceeds a predetermined retention or deductible. While this is a fundamental and important risk management tool that gives the plan some cost certainty, the coverage does not address multiple, subretention claims from a single event such as an automobile accident or an insured having triplets.
Most PopularCBS MoneyWatch.com Articles
Let's say a health plan decides that the maximum exposure it wants on any one claim is $1 million. It purchases excess reinsurance accordingly to help in ease an insured needs an organ transplant or has a complicated birth or pregnancy. But what if an insured employee and her family of four are in a car accident, incurring an average of $600,000 of medical expenses for each person? The plan now has $2.4 million of liability with little, or possibly no, reinsurance. Natural disasters such as Hurricane Katrina and accidents such as the nightclub fire in Rhode Island that occurred a couple of years ago pose similar threats, especially in smaller communities where a health plan might be the largest single payer.
Fortunately, this has not been a common occurrence for most health plans and their employer groups, but that may be changing. For one thing, advances in technology plus rising costs are pushing even some routine claims closer to the retention level. A far more likely scenario, however, is the possibility of having a multiple birth claim where, overnight--literally--one insured turns into four (See sidebar above).
Because of this, some health plans are starting to look at ways to supplement their excess reinsurance coverage with multiple-loss coverage to lessen the impact of several individual claims arising from a single event. Such multiple-loss programs are designed to offer significant coverage in a cost-effective manner. An important element of this type of coverage is how an event is defined. The most common definition allows the event to:
* occur in a period of seven days (this would include an earthquake and aftershocks)
* occur within a 50-mile radius
* not be a result of terrorism
Once an event occurs as defined above, the insured has two years from the date of the event to incur claims allowed under this coverage.
Typically, this coverage will also stipulate a deductible of a minimum number of lives (called a life warranty). The life warranty is frequently three lives, allowing coverage if three or more people are affected by an event. In addition to a life warranty, this type of reinsurance program also has a dollar-amount retention or deductible the client must absorb before reinsurance is payable.
Another coverage parameter is the minimum and maximum allowable claims per person paid by the carrier. The minimum allowable per person is usually $10,000, which keeps the cost of coverage down by preventing a high volume of noncatastrophic claims.
The maximum allowable claims limit per person paid by the carrier can be set to match the retention level at which a traditional excess medical treaty is purchased. If a client has a deductible of $500,000 as the maximum allowable per person on the traditional excess reinsurance, it would be common to also have $500,000 as the maximum allowable per person on this coverage. This approach, in effect, prevents duplicate coverage and premium payment on claims generated by one individual covered under both reinsurance products.
The maximum benefit for this type of coverage varies but a normal limit is $10 million. Here's an example of how this coverage works:
Responsible Insurance Company buys a multiple-loss reinsurance agreement with the following provisions:
* The agreement year is Jan. 1, 2005, to Dec. 31, 2005
* $1 million deductible (or retention)
* Three-life warranty
* $10,000 minimum any one life
* $500,000 maximum any one life
* $10 million maximum benefit
Responsible learns five of its insureds are involved in a single car accident on May 1, 2005. The following claims resulted from the injuries, and the treatment occurred during the two-year period from May 1, 2005, to April 30, 2007.
Insured A: $800,000
Insured B: $300,000
Insured C: $400,000
Insured D: $500,000
Insured E: $ 9,000
This accident meets the definition of an eligible event because it happened within the 12-month period of the agreement year, the claims were incurred within two years of the accident, and more than three people were affected, meeting the three-life warranty requirement.
So what is payable? Allowed amounts are:
Insured A: $500,000 (the maximum of $500,000 any one life applies)
Brought to you by CBS MoneyWatch.com
- Best- and Worst-Paid College Degrees
- 6 Things You Should Never Do on Twitter or Facebook
- How Much Sleep Do You Really Need?
- 6 Big Myths about Gas Mileage
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Freudenberg IT Invests $38 Million for Growth
- Research and Markets: Israel Ophthalmic Devices Investment Opportunities, Analysis and Future Forecasts Through to 2015
- Research and Markets: Emerging APAC (China) Networking Opportunity 2009 - Addressing a Growing Demand in a Downturn Economy
- Research and Markets: Indian Small & Medium Businesses SaaS Channel Partners 2009 - A Growing Opportunity in a Challenging Business Environment
- Research and Markets: Nippon Oil Corporation LNG Export and Import Markets, 2000 to 2015 Report - Profile and Analysis and Forecasts of Terminal Wise Capacity and Associated Contracts
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- Using object-oriented analysis and design over traditional structured analysis and design
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions




