The straight skinny on disk vs. tape pricing; tip: you may be surprised - Buyers Guide

Computer Technology Review, Nov, 2002 by Fred Moore

For years, tape was considered to be less expensive than disk storage. But after years of disk-price erosion, the perception that disk costs less than tape became more widespread. Determining the price of various storage subsystems has been subject to considerable misinterpretation, and meaningful pricing comparisons for tape and disk storage are scarce. For example, look at typical published average selling prices for various disk and tape subsystem components:

* 73GB Ultra SCSI hard drive: $861 (unit price), $11.82 (ASP$/GB)

* 181.6GB Ultra SCSI3 hard drive: $1,671 (unit price), $9.20 (ASP$/GB)

* 80GB Ultra ATA 100: $250 (unit price), $1.56 (ASP$/GB)

* 40GB Ultra ATA 100: $68 (unit price), $1.70 (ASP$/GB)

* SDLT Ultra SCSI tape drive: $5,800 (unit price), $26.36 (ASP$/GB)

* LTO Ultra SCSI tape drive: $5,300 (unit price), $26.50 (ASP$/GB)

* SDLT cartridge (220GB compressed): $129 (unit price), 59 cents (ASP$/GB)

* LTO cartridge (200GB compressed): $115 (unit price), 58 cents (ASP$/GB)

* Tape Library *: $33,000 -- $67,500 (unit price), $4.50-$1 .25 (ASP$/GB)

Note: ASP levels as of mid-September 2002 from storage VAR and online vendors including U.S. and international figures. Pricing levels may vary. * Prices used are for a variety of tape libraries ranging from 80 to 680-cartridge slot capacity.

Disk Pricing Considerations

Unfortunately, lists like the one above appear frequently and are often misinterpreted. The price of tape storage per gigabyte appears higher than the price of disk storage because the price per gigabyte of disk drives is lower than the price per gigabyte of tape drives. Adding the price of tape media only adds more to the tape price. For example, the prices of disk drives are indeed below the prices of tape drives and media, but these are not valid comparisons and do not represent the price of a working subsystem for either disk or tape. All too often, pricing comparisons are incorrectly made between the price of a disk drive and a tape drive. These do not represent real-life examples, however. The disk drive cannot function without a controller and the controller price uplifts the ASP of disk storage considerably-- typically adding five to 10 times the hard drive per gigabyte price. Therefore, disk pricing must be determined for a working and functional disk subsystem that includes the controller and hard d isk drives rather than just a single component of the subsystem.

To compare tape and disk pricing accurately, the prices for working subsystems must be used. Pricing for a workable disk subsystem falls into three distinct categories:

* Enterprise disk market: FC, SCSI; $70-$90 (ASP $/GB range for working disk subsystem)

* Mid-range disk market: SCSI, FC; $30-$40 (ASP $/GB range for working disk subsystem)

* Low-end "Ghetto RAID": IDE; $l0-$15

The price per gigabyte of the disk drive is actually a relatively small component of a workable disk subsystem price per gigabyte.

Tape Pricing Considerations

For tape pricing, no business normally operates a tape subsystem with just one tape drive and one tape cartridge. The most common tape environments will have an automated tape library containing several tape drives and several tape cartridges. The price of the associated tape library, tape drives and media contained in the library must be used to give a comparable (apples-to-apples) price comparison to disk prices. This then provides a comparison of working disk subsystems and tape subsystems, not just comparisons of the individual components. Comparing the price of a tape drive to the price of a hard disk drive is not a meaningful comparison.

* Enterprise tape library market: FC, SCSI; $1.2525 cents (ASP $/GB range for working disk subsystem)

* Mid-range tape library market: SCSI, FC; $4.50$1.25 (ASP $/GB range for working disk subsystem)

* Low-end market: SCSI, IDE; $l0-$ 15; NA, manual mount and autoloader

The key factor used to determine the purchase price per gigabyte for a working tape subsystem is the ratio of the number of tape cartridges to the number of tape drives. The price of tape decreases as the ratio of cartridges to drives increases. In a recent study by Horison Information Strategies, relative pricing comparisons were made for working subsystems of enterprise-class disk, mid-range disk, and for lower-cost IDE/ATA or subsystems, and for a variety of vendors' automated tape subsystems. For a working and functional tape subsystem, point-in-time average selling prices for automated tape libraries, ultra-SCSI tape drives and 100GB native, 200GB compressed cartridges were used. These comparisons do not include any storage management software, personnel or facility costs for tape or disk support.

To illustrate this key factor for tape pricing, for example, consider the following configuration. The smallest capacity library used in this study contained 80 cartridge slots and two SDLT tape drives yielding a capacity of 16TB at 200GB compressed per cartridge. The cartridge-to-drive ratio is 40. For pricing, the 80-slot library was priced at $33,375, two tape SDLT drives at $5,800 each and 80 100GB native capacity cartridges at $120 each. Total: $53,975 or $3.37 per gigabyte. By comparison, 16TB of disk storage will cost approximately $200,000 for IDE/ATA; $560,000 for mid-range disk; and $1.28 million for enterprise disk using the midpoints of each price range. Subsequent analysis may vary by changing the number of drives and cartridges.

 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
CXO UnpluggedSmart Business interviews on BNET

See and hear how senior level executives across the Asia Pacific are developing smart business ideas across a variety of sectors. The focus is on the future, and on how businesses need to evolve.

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with Thompson Gale