LanProbe fights fires; remote monitoring of 9000-user Carnegie-Mellon network

Communications News, May, 1990

LANPROBE FIGHTS FIRES

Frank Kietzke has a word for the network he manages at Carnegie-Mellon University.

Diversified.

"We have equipment from just about every vendor imaginable," he says.

As home to one of the nation's premier academic computer-science and engineering departments, CMU has an installed base of upcoming resources that covers the gamut of ever-evolving technologies, with mainframes, minicomputers and workstations.

Now, with one of academia's most sophisticated multivendor data communications systems, Carnegie-Mellon is a network model not only for higher education but commercial enterprises as well.

The reason: it works, and it works well.

Composed of hundreds of Ethernet, Appletalk and Token-Ring local area network subsystems, the campus-wide communications utility--known as ANDREW--connects some 2000 faculty and staff and 7000 students over an Ethernet backbone.

Centralized File

The system itself is based on what Kietzke, CMU's network manager, describes as a centralized file/distributed computing architecture.

Under this arrangement, users at workstations throughout the university's 50 buildings have minimal local storage capabilities. Instead, they rely on remote access to personal data and to executable programs which are stored on central file servers tied in over a LAN.

The "inverted" Ethernet backbone to which the various file servers and all subnetworks are connected is actually made up of two LattisNet chasses linked together over a bridge from Digital Equipment Corp. These LattisNets are equipped with interface cards to the various LANs that serve individual departments and workgroups.

Looking at a picture of the network, one might be reminded of two sets of railroad tracks that run parallel to one another. Each of these tracks contains spurs or subnetworks to various buildings on campus and also back to the main network management center.

This hypothetical "railway system," like CMU's network, is inverted; rather than extending the main railway route or backbone network to all campus buildings, a portion of each network is brought back to the main network management center.

"This way," Kietzke explains, "all network monitoring, maintenance and troubleshooting can be done from a central site. I never need to leave this room."

From his seat at a workstation in the university computing center, Kietzke's overall system management tasks include tracking not only the established network, routing and transport protocols of the various LANs in place, but also monitoring the array connectivity devices that link them together.

In this category, CMU's network hardware includes Kinetic Systems' Fastpath routers which link Appletalk nets to the Ethernet backbone, IBM AT-based routers that tie in Token Ring nets to the backbone, and "homegrown" 6800-based routers for Ethernet-to-Ethernet links.

Software snags can be disruptive. A malfunctioning network management interface card on one of the two LattisNet chasses can cause excessive packet collissions, resulting in a network-wide performance slow down or idling an entire network segment by misrouting correctly addressed packets.

To diagnose and troubleshoot these and other network problems, CMU relies on an intelligent network management product for Ethernet networks: Hewlett-Packard's LanProbe distributed analysis system.

An advantage of this system, says Kietzke, is that he and other network administrators can monitor critical aspects of all campus networks from one central site.

Each LanProbe segment monitor--CMU has two, one on each LattisNet chassis--comes with an internal 2400 baud modem, allowing remote access.

The management system software operates with Windows and contains a network mapping feature that lets users diagram network segments targeted for monitoring. These segments, as well as routers and gateways connecting them, also can be mapped.

Once this network map is generated and the LanProbe segment is attached to the end of an Ethernet segment, network administrators can collect data such as network statistics and error and collision rates.

Shows Traffic Stats

At CMU, the ProbeView Manager software runs on an IBM AT and can simultaneously display traffic statistics and segment activity in multiple windows, as all the network analysis tools run concurrently

Two tools in particular--Quick View and Packet Trace--have been used extensively at the university, especially in what Kietzke calls "firefighting situations."

He recalls: "In one case, we had a machine on an Ethernet answering address resolution protocol packets for everybody on the network. What would happen is the machine that answered all of these calls would simply throw away traffic meant for other nodes."

To find the problem node, Kietzke used packet tracing which can look at all packets or capture only specified packets.

Kietzke explains, "I got two answers back. One was from the machine that was supposed to be answering the address resolution protocol packet; the other was from the culprit, the machine that had been answering all calls.

 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
CXO UnpluggedSmart Business interviews on BNET

See and hear how senior level executives across the Asia Pacific are developing smart business ideas across a variety of sectors. The focus is on the future, and on how businesses need to evolve.

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with Thompson Gale