Manufacturing Industry

Manganese additive promotes soot oxidation

Diesel Fuel News, Nov 25, 2002 by Jack Peckham

San Diego -- The manganese-based "MMT" fuel-borne catalyst not only acts as a sulfur/phosphorous scavenger that could reduce poisoning of a nitrogen oxides (NOx) trap, but also lowers the temperature at which soot oxidizes in a diesel particulate filter (DPF), according to a new study.

With about 23 ppm of MMT added to diesel fuel, the DPF soot oxidation rate improves, as oxidation starts taking place at about 150[degrees]C lower than with a non-additized fuel, according to Ethyl Corp. test results presented to Diesel Engine Emissions Reduction (DEER) workshop here.

A higher treat rate (over 40 ppm) pushed the down the temperature for soot oxidation even further.

Ethyl first reported the sulfur-scavenging benefit of MMT for diesel NOx traps last year (see Diesel Fuel News 9/3/01, p3). Now, its latest tests show about a 4-5% improvement in NOx trap efficiency with an MMT-additized fuel, versus a 30-ppm sulfur baseline diesel fuel, at exhaust temperatures between 300-400[degrees]C.

The additive also sharply reduces soot-induced backpressure buildup in DPFs, compared to a baseline (non-additized) fuel, when filter inlet temperature was between 275-300[degrees]C. That's the temperature range normally cited for maintaining a "balance point" where soot oxidation roughly equals soot accumulation in a DPF.

On transient cycle tests, the MMT additive prevented backpressure from exceeding original equipment manufacturer (OEM) backpressure limits, compared to a non-additized baseline fuel.

At an estimated cost of less than 1 c/gallon, the additive has potential to pay for itself through fuel-economy benefits of lower backpressure, reduced costs of DPF/NOx trap systems, and improved catalyst system durability/efficiency, Ethyl's senior engineering specialist David Human explaine here.

The additive potentially could allow engine/aftertreatment systems developers to reduce warranty and initial equipment costs, and reduce the fuel-economy penalty from temperature-boosting schemes used to regenerate DPFs. It also might allow reduced precious-metal catalyst loadings or active regeneration hardware, Ethyl suggests.

Future research will include treat-rate optimization, various after-treatment combinations, field demonstrations and an analysis of possible OEM or retrofit applications. (Ethyl also reported its MMT/DPF results in a paper (SAE 2002-01-2728) to Society of Automotive Engineers Powertrain & Fluids conference here last month).

Automakers continue to criticize MMT however. A recent Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers study cites several problems in gasoline car catalysts that were exposed to gasoline-MMT blends, under certain test cycles. U.S. EPA is also a harsh critic of MMT and is demanding exhaustive health effects studies for the additive. Ethyl contends it has and continues to address these concerns with test programs and continuing studies.

COPYRIGHT 2002 Hart Energy Publishing, LP.
COPYRIGHT 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning
 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here

Content provided in partnership with Thompson Gale