Effect of endosulfan on male reproductive development - Children's Health

Environmental Health Perspectives, Dec, 2003 by Habibullah Saiyed, Aruna Dewan, Vijay Bhatnagar, Udyavar Shenoy, Rathika Shenoy, Hirehall Rajmohan, Kumud Patel, Rekha Kashyap, Pradip Kulkarni, Bagalur Rajan, Bhadabhai Lakkad

Our study results suggest that endosulfan exposure may delay sexual maturity and interfere with hormone synthesis in male children. To validate these findings, a study with larger sample size is essential. We do not know the significance of these findings. Long-term follow-up of the children is essential to understand the implications.

Table 1. Comparison of the mean ([  or -] SD) age and
some of the growth-related basic parameters in
study and control subjects participating in the SMR
examination.

Parameters           Control (n = 90)       Study (n = 117)

Age (years)        13.10 [  or -] 2.12    12.80 [  or -] 2.07
Height (cm)          141 [  or -] 10.60     139 [  or -] 13.30
Weight (kg)        30.70 [  or -] 7.44    29.50 [  or -] 8.93
Body mass index    15.30 [  or -] 1.98    15.00 [  or -] 2.11
Skin-fold
  thickness (mm)    7.31 [  or -] 2.15     7.40 [  or -] 2.28

Table 2. Summary of the multiple regression analysis
of parameters of SMR against age and history of
exposure to endosulfan through aerial spray.

Dependent                   Intercept
variable       [R.sup.2]   ([b.sub.0])

SMR score
  Pubic hair    0.48 **     -2.54 **
  Testes        0.43 **     -2.07 **
  Penis         0.43 **     -2.00 **

                     Age               AEE

Dependent
variable       [b.sub.1]    SE    [b.sub.2]    SE

SMR score
  Pubic hair    0.36 **    0.03   -0.43 **    0.11
  Testes        0.32 **    0.03   -0.32 *     0.11
  Penis         0.32 **    0.03   -0.37 *     0.12

No. of observations: study = 117; control = 90.

* p < 0.01. ** p < 0.001.

Table 3. Summary of the multiple regression analysis for serum
testosterone levels against age, history of AEE, and serum LH levels.

                   Age             Exposure            LH

Dependent
variable          b       SE       b        SE       b       SE

Testosterone   0.37 **   0.06   -0.62 **   0.21   1.09 **   0.20

No. of observations: study = 67; control = 46.
Overall [R.sup.2] = 0.61. ** p < 0.001.

Table 4. Mean [  or -] SE levels (ppb) of serum endosulfan
in study and control subjects.

                     Controll (n = 45)       Study (n = 70)

[alpha]-Endosulfan   0.87 [  or -] 0.23   4.24 [  or -] 0.74 **
[beta]-Endosulfan    0.40 [  or -] 0.17   1.77 [  or -] 0.36 **
Endosulfan sulfate   0.10 [  or -] 0.08   1.47 [  or -] 0.33 **
Total endosulfan     1.37 [  or -] 0.40   7.47 [  or -] 1.19 **

** p < 0.001.

REFERENCES

[Anonymous.] 2001. Data scan, capacity and technical production of pesticides in India. Pestic Inf 17:72-73.

ATSDR 2000. Toxicological Profile for Endosulfan. Atlanta, GA:Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Bowman MC, Schechter MS, Carter RL 1965. Behavior of chlorinated insecticides in a broad spectrum of soil types. J Agric Food Chem 13:360-365.

Chitra KC, Latchoumycandane C, Mathur PP. 1999 Chronic effect of endosulfan on the testicular functions of rat. Asian J Androl 1(4):203-206.

Dale WE, Curley A, Cueto C Jr. 1966. Hexane extractable chlorinated insecticides in human blood. Life Sci 5:47-54.

 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with Thompson Gale