College Board-Sponsored Study Claims SAT Is Good Predictor of Grades, Graduation - Scholastic Assessment Tests - Brief Article
Black Issues in Higher Education, May 24, 2001
At a time when the SAT college admission tests are under fire, new research says the scores are good forecasters of grades throughout college and whether students stay around to graduate.
Critics of the SAT as an admissions tool, however, raised questions early this month about the source of the research.
The College Board, which owns the SAT, paid about $250,000 for the three-year study by University of Minnesota graduate students.
"It does cast some suspicion, and I think it will for a lot of people," says Jane Brown, vice president for enrollment at Mount Holyoke College, which recently stopped requiring the SAT.
Wayne Camara, head of research at the College Board, brushed aside such criticism. The researchers were looking at existing findings, involving more than 1 million students, he says. Camara encouraged anyone to examine the study once it's published.
Using a new technique called meta-analysis, the study, which is the largest ever undertaken regarding the SAT, culled its results from more than 1,700 previous studies.
The meta-analysis is expected to be finished at the end of the year, when it will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals. The authors presented their results last month at a professional meeting in Seattle.
The research affirmed the SAT is a good predictor of grades for the first year of college, particularly the first semester. But it was also effective in forecasting a grade-point average through the fourth year. Further, it was useful in forecasting study habits, whether students stayed enrolled at the school and graduated in four or five years.
"College admissions officers do have to weigh what they're looking for in their student body," says Sarah Hezlett, the study's lead author and a doctoral student at the Twin Cities campus. But, she says, "if they are concerned about academic performance, and they're concerned about their graduation rate, failing to look at the SAT would result in throwing away information that will result in people getting a high GPA and whether or not they get their degree."
The various studies ranged from the 1940s to 1999. The vast majority were College Board studies correlating SAT scores with first-year results. The rest were independent, published and unpublished studies linking SAT scores to other outcomes.
Last year Mount Holyoke stopped requiring SAT scores, as have some 380 four-year institutions. The new findings are unlikely to change that policy, says Brown, enrollment chief at the women's college in South Hadley, Mass.
SAT scores were never more than 10 percent of an application, she says, adding that prospective students spend more time, money and worry than the scores warrant. There's also a risk of overlooking disadvantaged but promising students with lower scores.
"We knew that we had other ways of assessing students that were equally, if not more, predictive of success at Mount Holyoke," Brown says. "The SAT is a very narrow measure of student ability. Frankly, I think GPA is a very narrow predictor. I'd rather look at civic engagement. What are the measures of success from a societal point of view?"
Earlier this year, University of California President Richard Atkinson, a testing expert, called for dropping the SAT I, proposing instead the SAT II subject tests of what students learned.
"Certainly the timing is interesting," says Michael Reese, University of California system spokesman, when told of the research findings. "I would hope that those who give credence to this research make an appropriate note of the College Board's involvement."
The University of California system reviewed 50,000 of its own students and found high school grades and SAT II subject tests better than the SAT I at predicting academic performance.
For that reason, Atkinson is asking the faculty and Board of Regents to shift more to high school grades and standardized tests linked to curriculum and school subjects.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Reference Articles
- A Maryland state trooper gave Erik Bonstrom an $80 ticket for driving too slowly
- In California, postal worker Dean Hudson has been found guilty
- Alec Loorz, the 15-year-old founder of Kids vs. Global Warming and recent Brower Youth Award recipient, went to Congress in November for a press conference with Senators Barbara Boxer and John Kerry, who are championing legislation to stabilize US greenho
- Foreign exchange
- The buzz on bees
Most Recent Reference Publications
Most Popular Reference Articles
- Credit card debt on college campuses: causes, consequences, and solutions
- 9 questions to ask your new lover: what you were afraid to ask, but always wanted to know
- How Tyler Perry rose from homelessness to a $5 million mansion
- Rejoice anyway - Zephaniah 3:14-20, Philippians 4:4-7 - Living by the Word - Column
- Living by the word


