Business Services Industry
Court Rulings Give AOL Three New Victories in the Battle Against Junk E-Mail
Business Wire, Dec 21, 1998
DULLES, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 21, 1998--
Company Files Nine New Lawsuits in Five States Targeting
Porn Spammers, Get-Rich-Quick Schemers, and
Junk E-Mail Software Distributors
America Online, Inc. (NYSE: AOL) today announced that it has won three lawsuits brought against junk e-mailers as part of the Company's continuing effort to protect AOL members from unwanted junk e-mail.
In each of these victories, the court awarded AOL substantial monetary damages. And, for the first time in one case, the Court applied federal and state computer fraud statutes recognizing that existing computer fraud statutes apply to the transmission of falsified e-mail.
AOL has also has filed nine new lawsuits in five states - California, New York, Iowa, Florida and Virginia targeting porn-spammers, get-rich-quick schemers and sellers of spamming software. The suits were brought against spammers whose mailings had all resulted in complaints from AOL members.
"These legal victories underscore the court's recognition that junk e-mail damages both our members and AOL," said Randall Boe, AOL's Associate General Counsel. "They also deliver a strong message: AOL will not tolerate junk e-mail on its network and will take every legal step necessary to respond to our members' complaints and protect their online experience. The weight and authority of the law are clearly on the side of AOL and our members, who have made it plain that they do not like or want unsolicited junk e-mail."
Three Legal Victories
AOL vs. LCGM, Inc. (Madison Heights, MI)
LCGM, a well known spammer for pornographic web sites, was ordered by the court to pay AOL damages and costs, including attorney's fees, for sending millions of pieces of junk e-mail to AOL members.
The Court also ordered LCGM to cease its transmission of junk e-mail to AOL members. The Court noted that in the course of sending this junk e-mail, LCGM had also violated the AOL's trademark through its use of the AOL.com domain name.
Most significantly, the Court also ruled that LCGM, by employing methods and software designed to defeat AOL's spam filtering technologies, had committed fraud. The Court therefore applied both state (VA) and federal computer fraud laws.
This first-time-ever application of these statutes in an anti-spamming case breaks new ground in this area of the law and provides AOL and other Internet or online service providers with a new weapon in the fight against spam. Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
AOL vs. Prime Data Systems (Bowling Green, Kentucky)
The Court ordered Prime Data, and its principal operator Vernon Hale, to pay damages to AOL for the costs of handling millions of pieces of junk e-mail sent by Prime Data to AOL members. The court also noted that the "malicious" nature of the defendant's conduct warranted punitive damages triple the amount of the actual damages.
Further, the Court determined that Prime Data and Hale had violated AOL's trademark rights and, as a result, awarded AOL attorney's fees. The court also provided AOL with permanent injunctive relief barring Hale and Prime Data from ever again sending e-mail to AOL or its members. Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
AOL vs. IMS, et. al. (Knoxville, TN)
In a previous ruling, the case against IMS yielded the first-ever judicial opinion finding that "AOL.com" forgery violates federal trademark statutes.
In bringing this case to a conclusion, the Court ruled against IMS, its principal Joe Melle and two other spammers: Brian Robbins, a spammer advertising a dubious "credit repair" scheme, and Neil Byron Goodson, a Louisiana-based seller of "Floodgate" spam software.
The Court found each liable for actual damages and imposed triple punitive damages. The Court also provided AOL with injunctive relief and barred the defendants from ever again sending e-mail to AOL or its members as well as barring them from using the AOL service for any reason. Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Nine New Lawsuits Filed in Five States
In a sweeping new phase in its effort to protect AOL members from junk e-mail, AOL today announced that it has brought lawsuits against nine well-known spammers in five different states - Virginia, Iowa, Florida, California and New York.
Regarding these newly filed lawsuits, Boe said, "We want spammers everywhere to know that we will find you and come after in you court. We want our members to know is that we will continue to be aggressive on their behalf and in defending their online experience."
The cases filed by AOL today are listed below by state:
Virginia
Power Promo and Forrest Dayton (Marietta, GA): AOL has brought suit against Power Promo and Mr. Dayton not only for their prolific spamming activities, but also for their selling of the "Stealth" software program, which encourages and enables junk e-mailers to evade the technological blocks and filtering software AOL and others use to block spam.
AOL is also seeking to hold Power Promo accountable for its manufacture and distribution of junk e-mail software. Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions




