Business Services Industry
Bush Makes Up Ground and Now Leads by 3%; Gore's Lead Among Women Decreases
Business Wire, Oct 13, 2000
Business and Government Editors
ROCHESTER, N.Y.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 13, 2000
As of early October, George W. Bush leads Al Gore by three percentage points. In the most recent Harris Interactive Election 2000 survey, 46% of registered voters say they will vote for George W. Bush this fall, while 43% will vote for Al Gore when asked to consider a four-person race (see Table 1). Buchanan and Nader receive 2% and 6% of the vote respectively.
The survey was conducted from October 4th to October 10th among 5,318 registered voters selected at random from the Harris Interactive Internet panel of more than 7 million respondents.
In the previous Harris Interactive Election 2000 survey, conducted from September 7th to September 12th, George W. Bush trailed by 3%. Bush has benefited from a 6% shift in the race over the last month. A portion of Bush's new lead can be attributed to women voters. Gore's lead among women has decreased over the past month. In September, Bush trailed Gore by 15% among women, and now he only trails by 6% (see Table 2). The women's vote is shaping up to be the deciding factor in this year's election.
This national poll is just part of the largest private polling program ever undertaken: Harris Interactive Election 2000. Coming in a week: Harris Interactive state-by-state poll results as of mid-October. Watch for our final poll results in November where we expect to call Presidential, Senatorial and Gubernatorial races in a poll involving more than 100,000 respondents. You can view the results of our polls at Excite@Home's elections site (http://chooseorloose.excite.com/). Visitors to the site can cast their votes on these questions and compare their opinions with those who were surveyed from Harris Interactive's online panel of more than 7 million respondents and with other Excite.com members. They can also register with the Harris Poll Online in time to participate in our election surveys this fall.
TABLE 1
Four Person Race: Bush, Gore, Buchanan, and Nader
Base: Registered voters
"If the presidential election were held today between George W.
Bush for the Republicans, Al Gore for the Democrats, Pat Buchanan for
the Reform Party and Ralph Nader for the Green Party who would you
most likely vote for?"
October September
% %
George W. Bush 46 43
Al Gore 43 46
Pat Buchanan 2 2
Ralph Nader 6 6
None of these 1 1
Not sure 2 2
Note: Some percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding.
TABLE 2
Four Person race by Sex
Base: Registered Voters
"If the presidential election were held today between George W.
Bush for the Republicans, Al Gore for the Democrats, Pat Buchanan for
the Reform Party and Ralph Nader for the Green Party who would you
most likely vote for?"
George W. Al Gore Pat Buchanan
Bush
Oct Sept Oct Sept Oct Sept
% % % % % %
Male 51 49 39 40 3 2
Female 41 37 47 52 1 2
Ralph Nader None of these Not sure
Oct Sept Oct Sept Oct Sept
% % % % % %
Male 6 5 (a) 1 2 2
Female 7 7 1 1 3 2
Note: Some percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding.
(a) Less than 1%.
Methodology
This Harris Interactive Election 2000 study was conducted between October 4th to October 10th with a national sample of 5,318 respondents from the Harris Interactive panel of online respondents. Data were weighted by age, sex, education, income, race/ethnicity, region, and the propensity to be online, in order to generalize the results to the national online population.
In theory with a randomly chosen sample of this size and after weighting the data, one could say with 95 percent certainty that the results have a statistical precision of plus or minus 3 percentage points of what they would be if the entire adult online population of the United States had been polled. The sample used by Harris Interactive is not a random sample. While individuals have been randomly sampled from our database for this survey, they have previously chosen to take part in the Harris Interactive database.
There are several other possible sources of error in all polls or surveys that are probably more serious than theoretical calculations of sampling error. These potential sources of error include question wording and question order, non-response, and screening (e.g. for likely voters). It is difficult or impossible to quantify the errors that may result from these factors so the words "margin of error" should be avoided when reporting all survey data.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Using object-oriented analysis and design over traditional structured analysis and design
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions


