Business Services Industry
Lovell & Stewart and Sirota & Sirota Announce Securities Fraud Class Action Against iVillage Inc., Officers and Directors, Investment Banks
Business Wire, June 6, 2001
Business & Legal Editors
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 6, 2001
The law firms of Lovell & Stewart, LLP ((212) 608-1900 or www.lovellstewart.com) and Sirota & Sirota, LLP ((212) 425-9055 or www.sirotalaw.com) filed a class action lawsuit on June 5, 2001 on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased, converted, exchanged or otherwise acquired the common stock of iVillage Inc. (NasdaqNM:IVIL) between March 18, 1999 and October 28, 1999 inclusive. The lawsuit asserts claims under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated by the SEC thereunder and seeks to recover damages. Any member of the class may move the Court to be named lead plaintiff. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 6, 2001.
The action, Saul Kassin v. iVillage Inc., et al., is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (500 Pearl Street, New York, New York), Docket No. 01-CV-4974 (SWK) and has been assigned to the Hon. Shirley Wohl Kram, U.S. District Judge. The complaint alleges that iVillage Inc. and certain of its current and former officers and directors violated the federal securities laws by issuing and selling iVillage common stock pursuant to the initial public offering without disclosing to investors that at least two of the lead underwriters and two of the other underwriters of the IPO had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors.
In exchange for the excessive commissions, the complaint alleges, lead underwriters The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. and underwriters FleetBoston Robertson Stephens, Inc. and Lehman Brothers, Inc. allocated iVillage shares to customers at the IPO price of $24.00 per share. To receive the allocations (i.e., the ability to purchase shares) at $24.00, the defendant underwriters' brokerage customers had to agree to purchase additional shares in the aftermarket at progressively higher prices. The requirement that customers make additional purchases at progressively higher prices as the price of iVillage stock rocketed upward (a practice known on Wall Street as "laddering") was intended to (and did) drive iVillage's share price up to artificially high levels. This artificial price inflation, the complaint alleges, enabled both the underwriters and their customers to reap enormous profits by buying iVillage stock at the $24.00 IPO price and then selling it later for a profit at inflated aftermarket prices, which rose as high as $100.00 during its first day of trading.
Rather than allowing their customers to keep their profits from the IPO, the complaint alleges, the defendant underwriters required their customers to "kick back" some of their profits in the form of secret commissions. These secret commission payments were sometimes calculated after the fact based on how much profit each investor had made from his or her IPO stock allocation.
The complaint further alleges that defendants violated the Securities Act of 1933 because the Prospectus distributed to investors and the Registration Statement filed with the SEC in order to gain regulatory approval for the iVillage offering contained material misstatements regarding the commissions that the underwriters would derive from the IPO and failed to disclose the additional commissions and "laddering" scheme discussed above.
Christopher Lovell, the senior partner at Lovell & Stewart, has been appointed lead counsel or co-lead counsel in numerous significant class actions, including actions involving reportedly the largest class action recoveries in history under three separate federal statutes (the Sherman Antitrust Act, the Commodity Exchange Act, and the Investment Company Act of 1940). These record-breaking recoveries for class plaintiffs included the $1.027 billion recovery in In re: NASDAQ Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation and a $145.35 million recovery in 1999 in In re: Sumitomo Copper Litigation, a class action against various parties who conspired to manipulate the worldwide copper and copper futures markets for their own profit.
Howard Sirota and the Sirota & Sirota firm have taken leadership roles in numerous high-profile and legally significant cases, including serving as Chairman of the Executive Committee of plaintiffs' attorneys in the landmark In re: Crazy Eddie Securities Litigation case ($93 million recovery for class, with additional payments from defendants expected in the future) and serving as a member of the Executive Committee in In re: Structural Dynamics Research Corporation ($37.5 million recovery).
Investors who purchased iVillage common stock during the period March 18, 1999 through October 28, 1999 may contact Lovell & Stewart or Sirota & Sirota at the telephone numbers, addresses or E-mail addresses below for more information regarding the class action lawsuit. Investors can also visit Lovell & Stewart's website at www.lovellstewart.com or Sirota & Sirota's website at www.sirotalaw.com to view a copy of the complaint.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions


