Business Services Industry
Milberg Weiss Announces The Filing Of A Class Action Suit on Behalf of Purchasers of the Securities of PerkinElmer, Inc
Business Wire, July 8, 2002
Business Editors & Legal Writers
The law firm of Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP announces that a class action lawsuit was filed on July 1, 2002, on behalf of purchasers of the securities of PerkinElmer, Inc. ("PerkinElmer" or the "Company") (NYSE: PKI) between July 15, 2001 and April 11, 2002, inclusive, (the "Class Period'). A copy of the complaint filed in this action is available from the Court, or can be viewed on Milberg Weiss' website at: http://www.milberg.com/cases/perkinelmer/.
> The action, numbered 02-11314 (GAO), is pending in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts located at 1 Courthouse Way, Boston, Massachusetts against defendants PerkinElmer, Gregory L. Summe (CEO, President and Chairman) and Robert F. Friel (CFO). The Honorable George A. O'Toole, Jr. is the Judge presiding over the action.The complaint charges that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, by issuing a series of materially false and misleading statements to the market between July 15, 2001 and April 11, 2002. According to the complaint, PerkinElmer issued numerous press releases regarding its performance during the Class Period which represented that the Company was successfully growing its revenues and earnings, that the Company's transformation into a provider of health-related products and services was proceeding successfully and that the Company would meet its financial performance targets for 2002. The complaint further alleges that these, and other, representations were materially false and misleading because they failed to disclose that PerkinElmer was experiencing a decline in the demand for its products, especially at its Optoeletronics division, the Company was carrying tens of millions of dollars of obsolete inventory on its books and the Company's expenses were soaring due to the spate of numerous acquisitions and divestitures it had undertaken. On March 1, 2002, PerkinElmer issued a press release revealing that first quarter of 2002 revenues and earnings would be materially less than the Company had represented its figures would be only three weeks earlier. In reaction to the announcement, the price of PerkinElmer's common stock plummeted by 31%. The full truth regarding PerkinElmer's business was not fully disclosed until April 11, 2002, when the Company issued a press release revealing that its reported earnings will be breakeven, instead of the figure of $0.16-$0.17 per share that the Company had stated, on March 1, it expects to earn, and that its revenues will decline in the first quarter of 2002 because of weakness in all of its division. In reaction to the announcement, PerkinElmer's stock plummeted by another 28%, falling from $16.70 per share on April 10, 2002 to $12.04 by the close of April 11, on extremely heavy trading volume. The individual defendants and other PerkinElmer insiders sold a total of 595,000 PerkinElmer common stock during the Class Period, reaping gross proceeds in excess of $18.4 million and the Company completed a significant acquisition using its common stock as currency.
If you bought the securities of PerkinElmer between July 15, 2001 and April 11, 2002, you may, no later than September 6, 2002, request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the Court must determine that the class member's claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that the class member will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as "lead plaintiff." Your ability to share in any recovery is not, however, affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, or other counsel of your choice, to serve as your counsel in this action.
Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (http://www.milberg.com) is a 190-lawyer firm with offices in New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Boca Raton, Philadelphia and Seattle, and is active in major litigations pending in federal and state courts throughout the United States. Milberg Weiss has taken a leading role in many important actions on behalf of defrauded investors, consumers, and others, and has been responsible for more than $20 billion in aggregate recoveries. Please contact the Milberg Weiss website for more information about the firm. If you wish to discuss this action with us, or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights and interests with regard to the case, please contact the following attorneys:
Steven G. Schulman or Samuel H. Rudman One Pennsylvania Plaza, 49th fl. New York, NY, 10119-0165 Phone number: (800) 320-5081 Email: perkinelmer@milbergNY.com Website: http://www.milberg.com
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn’t Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions


