Business Services Industry
Fitch Lowers Protective Life As Part of Industry Review
Business Wire, Sept 19, 2002
Business Editors
CHICAGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 19, 2002
Fitch Ratings has lowered the ratings of Protective Life Insurance Company (Protective Life) and its wholly owned subsidiaries (Protective) as part of a comprehensive industry review of all North American life insurance company ratings that was initiated on August 14, 2002, and completed today. The ratings affected by today's actions are the insurer financial strength ratings of Protective, which were lowered to 'AA-' from 'AA', the senior debt of Protective Life Corporation, which was lowered to 'A-' from 'A ' and the trust preferred securities of PLC Capital Trust I and III, which were lowered to 'BBB ' from 'A'. Protective represents one of 35 life insurance groups, making up approximately 42% of Fitch's ratings universe, that had ratings lowered as a result of the review. The Rating Outlook for all ratings is Stable.
The industry review was the result of Fitch's belief that recent adverse performance within the investment markets required an accelerated recognition of certain industry trends that have been negatively impacting life insurers for some time. These trends, specifically unfavorable competitive pressures and product portfolio migration, have been inherent in Fitch's long-standing Negative Rating Outlook on the industry and, as a result of the review, have been fully considered into ratings generally. The review led to the establishment of higher standards for each rating category in many quantitative and qualitative areas of analysis.
Rating changes at the company level involved a reassessment of each insurer's fundamental characteristics relative to Fitch's new ratings standards. This included a review of the company's product risk profile and fundamental competitive and operating characteristics, and a review of the company's capital position (risk-based capital ratios, financial leverage and capital size), among numerous other factors. Fitch also looked closely at recent and anticipated investment performance under current adverse capital markets conditions.
The rating action on Protective's IFS ratings was driven primarily by Fitch's enhanced criteria for all insurer financial strength ratings including well established business position in either a major market, or leadership positions in several well defined niche markets, and clear competitive advantages in core businesses. The IFS rating action was also driven by Fitch's reassessment of product risk within the industry, with higher risk recognition for stable value and annuity products. The rating action on Protective's fixed income ratings was driven by Fitch's notching standards from the lower IFS rating.
The ratings also reflect Protective's high quality, liquid investment portfolio that continues to produce excellent results during the current difficult credit environment; strong, stable operating earnings; demonstrated ability to enter new markets, expand and diversify distribution and build niche businesses; sound asset liability management enhanced by lower risk product design and strict pricing discipline for stable value products and acquisitions; consistent capital growth; and conservative senior management focused on profitable growth using moderate financial leverage.
Entity/Issue/Type Action Rating/Outlook Protective Life Insurance Company --Insurer financial strength Lowered 'AA-'/Stable. Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company --Insurer financial strength Lowered 'AA-'/Stable. Empire General Life Assurance Company --Insurer financial strength Lowered 'AA-'/Stable. West Coast Life Insurance Company --Insurer financial strength Lowered 'AA-'/Stable. Protective Life Corporation --Senior debt Lowered 'A-'/Stable. PLC Capital Trust I --Trust preferred securities Lowered 'BBB '/Stable. PLC Capital Trust III --Trust preferred securities Lowered 'BBB '/Stable.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Using object-oriented analysis and design over traditional structured analysis and design
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions



