Business Services Industry
A.M. Best Rates I-Preferred Term Securities I; An Insurance CDO
Business Wire, March 12, 2003
Business Editors
OLDWICK, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 12, 2003
A.M. Best Co. has assigned ratings to a multi-tranche collateralized debt obligation (CDO) co-issued by two bankruptcy remote special purpose vehicles, I-Preferred Trust Securities Ltd. and I-Preferred Trust Securities Inc. (the "Issuers").
The co-placement agents for the transaction are FTN Financial Capital Markets and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
The rated notes, totaling $328.0 million in principal, are collateralized by trust preferred securities, surplus notes and secondary market securities (collectively, the "Capital Securities"), issued primarily by small to medium-sized U.S. insurance entities. A.M. Best has assigned ratings of "aaa" to Class A Senior Notes, "a-" to Class B Mezzanine Notes and "bbb" to Class C Mezzanine Notes. All the notes have a stated maturity date of 2032, including $31.3 million of unrated Subordinate Income Notes (the "Income Notes"). Notwithstanding, the notes can be redeemed prior to the maturity date through several mechanisms including a successful auction of the Capital Securities which commences on the 10th anniversary.
CDO Tranches
Notes Amount($mm) Rating Coupon
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Class A-1 Senior Notes 174.0 aaa 3M LIBOR
125 bps
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Class A-2 Senior Notes 12.0 aaa 4.3% / 3M
LIBOR
125 bps(a)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Class A-3 Senior Notes 24.0 aaa 5.00% / 3M
LIBOR
125 bps(b)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Class B-1 Mezzanine Notes 40.6 a- 3M LIBOR
210 bps
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Class B-2 Mezzanine Notes 33.2 a- 5.15% / 3M
LIBOR
210 bps(a)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Class B-3 Mezzanine Notes 28.2 a- 5.90% / 3M
LIBOR
210 bps(b)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Class C Mezzanine Notes 16.0 bbb 3M LIBOR
375 bps
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Rated Notes 328.0 -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subordinate Income Notes 31.3 N.R.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL RATED & UNRATED NOTES 359.3 -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) The fixed coupon is for the first three years of the transaction.
(b) The fixed coupon is for the first five years of the transaction.
Major considerations in rating the notes included: collateral default risk and associated assumed recoveries based on A.M. Best Financial Strength Ratings (FSR); collateral diversity; structural protection through the "waterfall" and other mechanisms; counterparty swaps and interest rate cap protection; legal documentation; and ongoing monitoring of the transaction.
Brief comments on these considerations follow.
Quantification of Collateral Default Risk: A.M. Best maintains interactive ratings on 29 of the 31 companies in the transaction. The initial weighted average FSR of the underlying insurance entities issuing the Capital Securities is A- (Excellent). The default risk attributed to the Capital Securities is based on A.M. Best's proprietary default statistics. A.M. Best adjusted these default statistics to arrive at a proprietary deferral-adjusted default probability table which aggregates default and interest-deferral probabilities. Based on the deferral-adjusted default probability table, conservative recovery assumptions that recognize the regulatory environment of the insurance industry, the "waterfall" as defined by the indenture and the results of stressed Monte Carlo simulations, A.M. Best determined that defaults on the notes are within the default thresholds established for each rating category.
Collateral Diversity: A.M. Best performed qualitative and quantitative analyses on the participants in the pool on both an individual and aggregate level. In addition, A.M. Best compared the pool's characteristics and performance with industry levels, as well as individual issuers within the pool with their peers. Also considered were the historical performance of pool members; the mix of life companies versus property and casualty companies; regulatory domicile of each issuer; product lines by industry segment; stock vs. mutual companies; investment composition and performance of invested assets; short-tail vs. long-tail business lines of property/casualty companies; operating and underwriting performance of each issuer; dividend-paying capacity of operating companies; and leverage and coverage analyses of each issuer.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions


