Business Services Industry
Maxwell Shoe Company Board of Directors Determines Jones's Revised Unsolicited Offer is Financially Inadequate
Business Wire, June 7, 2004
Business Editors
HYDE PARK, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 7, 2004
Maxwell Shoe Company Inc.(NASDAQ:MAXS):
Board Expects To Meet With Jones To Explore Whether Jones
Is Prepared To Recognize Full Value Of Maxwell Shoe Company
Maxwell Shoe Company Inc. (NASDAQ: MAXS) announced today that its Board of Directors has unanimously determined that Jones Apparel Group, Inc.'s (NYSE: JNY) revised unsolicited tender offer for all of the outstanding shares of Maxwell Shoe Company common stock for $22.50 per share in cash is financially inadequate and not in the best interests of Maxwell Shoe Company's stockholders. Accordingly, the Maxwell Shoe Company Board of Directors recommends that its stockholders reject Jones's revised offer and not tender their shares.
"At $22.50 per share, Jones's revised offer still fails to provide our stockholders with the value they deserve. And as we've said before, this is all about stockholder value," said Mark Cocozza, Maxwell Shoe Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
"Fiscal 2003 was the best sales and earnings year in our Company's history, and based on the first two quarters of fiscal 2004, we are on track to surpass even that superior performance. All of Maxwell Shoe Company's brands are being well received by retailers. We have industry leading merchandising and design expertise, an ability to target all channels of distribution, and a strong capital position. By leveraging these strengths, I am confident that we can create value for our stockholders in excess of Jones's revised offer. We have consistently delivered on our promises in the past, and we will continue to do so in the future," continued Mr. Cocozza.
In reaching its recommendation that stockholders reject Jones's revised offer, Maxwell Shoe Company's Board of Directors considered among other things, that:
-- Maxwell Shoe Company's independent financial advisors, Lehman
Brothers Inc., issued an opinion stating that, as of June 6,
2004, and subject to the qualifications and limitations set
forth in the written opinion, Jones's revised offer is
inadequate to Maxwell Shoe Company's stockholders from a
financial point of view;
-- Jones's revised offer undervalues Maxwell Shoe Company based
on its business, financial condition and performance, its
unique market position and business prospects and continued
market leadership, the strength and diversity of the Company's
portfolio of brands, backlog of new business and significant
future growth opportunities;
-- Maxwell Shoe Company's Board of Directors and senior
leadership team believe that they can create stockholder value
in excess of Jones's revised offer through the continued
execution of its current strategy;
-- Since February 25, 2004, when Jones first publicly announced
its proposal to acquire Maxwell Shoe Company, Maxwell Shoe
Company has twice increased its net sales and earnings
expectations for fiscal 2004. On May 20, 2004, Maxwell Shoe
Company announced that it expects fiscal 2004 net sales to be
in the range of $255 million to $260 million and earnings per
share to be in the range of $1.21 to $1.25, excluding costs
related to Jones's unsolicited tender offer. Based on the
Company's unprecedented level of backlog and 18-quarter track
record of meeting or beating expectations, Maxwell Shoe
Company is confident that it can continue to achieve its
goals; and
-- Jones's revised offer does not adequately compensate Maxwell
Shoe Company stockholders for transferring control of Maxwell
Shoe Company to Jones.
The Maxwell Shoe Company Board stated that, consistent with its commitment to enhance stockholder value, it expects to meet with Jones to explore whether Jones is prepared to increase its revised offer to a level that fully reflects the value of Maxwell Shoe Company. However, Maxwell Shoe Company's Board believes that the Company's full value is in excess of the additional "couple of pennies" by which Jones, during its May 26, 2004 conference call, said it might be willing to increase its $22.50 offer. There can be no assurance that any discussions would lead to an agreement or transaction.
Mr. Cocozza concluded, "Our Board and management team have always been committed to enhancing stockholder value. We have an outstanding record of value creation and are poised for continued growth. We welcome the opportunity to meet with Jones and demonstrate the value inherent in our Company. However, if we are unable to reach agreement with Jones on price, we will continue enhancing stockholder value through all appropriate means, which would potentially include stock repurchases or an extraordinary dividend. We will also continue to seek additional brands to license and otherwise act responsibly to protect the interests of our stockholders and ensure that they receive full value for their investment."
Maxwell Shoe Company continues to urge stockholders to discard any gold consent cards they receive from Jones and SIGN, DATE and RETURN the Company's BLUE consent revocation cards today.
Lehman Brothers Inc. is serving as financial advisor to Maxwell Shoe Company and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP is serving as legal counsel.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Freudenberg IT Invests $38 Million for Growth
- Research and Markets: Israel Ophthalmic Devices Investment Opportunities, Analysis and Future Forecasts Through to 2015
- Research and Markets: Emerging APAC (China) Networking Opportunity 2009 - Addressing a Growing Demand in a Downturn Economy
- Research and Markets: Indian Small & Medium Businesses SaaS Channel Partners 2009 - A Growing Opportunity in a Challenging Business Environment
- Research and Markets: Nippon Oil Corporation LNG Export and Import Markets, 2000 to 2015 Report - Profile and Analysis and Forecasts of Terminal Wise Capacity and Associated Contracts
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- Using object-oriented analysis and design over traditional structured analysis and design
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions



