Business Services Industry
Fitch Expects to Rate FPL Energy National Wind Opco 'BBB' and Holdco 'BB'
Business Wire, Feb 9, 2005
CHICAGO -- Fitch Ratings expects to assign ratings of 'BBB' and 'BB' to FPL Energy National Wind, LLC's (the Opco) $351 million senior secured indebtedness due 2024 and to FPL Energy National Wind Portfolio, LLC's (the Holdco) $100 million senior secured indebtedness due 2019, respectively. The Holdco owns 100% of the Opco and, in turn, is a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of FPL Group Capital, Inc. (FPL Group, rated 'A' by Fitch). The purpose of the proposed financing is to recapitalize a portfolio of wind farms constructed with members' equity. After funding reserve accounts and paying transaction costs, the net proceeds of the issuance will be distributed to FPL Energy, LLC, the sponsor.
The Opco is a portfolio of nine operating wind farms with an aggregate capacity of approximately 534 MW. Each project company is wholly owned by the Opco and is otherwise unencumbered with project-level indebtedness. All of the output of each wind farm is committed under long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) with counterparties that are unaffiliated with the Opco. Under the agreements, the Opco generally receives a fixed-energy price for all energy produced by the wind farm, and the counterparty generally pays all costs associated with transmission and scheduling.
The Holdco is a special-purpose vehicle formed to own 100% of the Opco. Distributions from the Opco are the Holdco's sole source of revenues. Neither the Opco nor the Holdco has any employees. Operations and maintenance activity will be the responsibility of an affiliate, FPL Energy Operating Services, Inc. Management and overhead functions will be performed by other affiliated entities.
Rating Rationale
The rating of the Opco bonds is based on the stand-alone credit quality of the Opco, which is derived from the aggregated cash flow generated from the nine wind farm assets and protections in the project indenture. Fitch believes the circumstances of the portfolio, including number of turbines, maintenance requirements, and experience of the sponsor, suggest that a gradual erosion of cash flow or a temporary increase in expenditures is unlikely. Accordingly, Fitch believes the portfolio can withstand debt-service coverages in a stress scenario that are lower than typically observed in the rating category.
Fitch views the structural subordination of the Holdco debt as commensurate with deeply subordinated debt of the Opco. Fitch's policy for deeply subordinated debt requires a three-notch differential between the ratings of the senior and subordinate debt unless other circumstances suggest greater notching. Distribution tests at the Opco and consolidated coverage of the combined Opco and Holdco debt service suggest that the minimum three notches are appropriate.
The sponsor's outside counsel will provide an opinion that in the event of a bankruptcy of the Holdco's direct and indirect owners, the assets and liabilities of the Holdco would not be consolidated with those of its owners under the federal bankruptcy laws. Furthermore, in the event of a bankruptcy of the Holdco, the assets and liabilities of the Opco would not be consolidated with those of the Holdco. Accordingly, Fitch views the credit quality of the Opco and Holdco to be structurally independent of the rating of its owners.
Although the ratings are not directly linked to the ratings of the sponsor, the credit quality of the sponsor is considered a constraint on the rating of the Opco. FPL Group guarantees an average of approximately 40% of annual Opco revenues over the first eight years of the debt life, and affiliated companies manage the operations of the facilities. In the event the future rating of the sponsor deteriorates below the stand-alone credit quality of the Opco, the ratings of the Opco and Holdco bonds will likely be constrained by the then-current rating of FPL Group.
The rating of the Opco incorporates the following strengths and concerns.
Primary credit strengths:
-- The portfolio provides significant equipment, technology, and regional diversity;
-- The maintenance requirements of wind turbines minimize the potential for unexpected costs;
-- Substantially all revenues are derived under fixed-price arrangements;
-- Revenues are derived from counterparties with a strong investment-grade profile;
-- The transaction structure incorporates meaningful liquidity to minimize technology risks;
-- The sponsor is reported to own the largest fleet of wind turbines in the U.S. and has publicly stated a long-term strategy in the sector.
Primary credit concerns:
-- The financial projections rely on wind data collected over a short period of time;
-- The portfolio and certain turbine models have a limited operating history.
Financial Analysis
In the sponsor's base case, annual DSCRs for the Opco gradually rise to 2.2 times (x) at maturity from 1.7x with an average of 1.8x. Consolidated annual DSCRs for the combined Opco and Holdco debt are approximately 1.3x in all years until the maturity of the Holdco debt. The sponsor's base case incorporates conservative modeling assumptions for several wind farms. Fitch believes there are credible arguments that the sponsor's base-case cash flows could be stronger in the long term than indicated in the projections.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article


