Business Services Industry
Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Award in Smoker's Case against Philip Morris USA: Company Will Seek Further Review
Business Wire, Feb 2, 2006
NEW YORK -- The Oregon Supreme Court today affirmed a $79.5 million punitive damages jury verdict against Philip Morris USA. The company contends the award, which is 152 times the compensatory judgment, is grossly excessive and bears no reasonable relation to the compensatory judgment in violation of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in State Farm v. Campbell. In that landmark 2003 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court imposed limitations on the imposition of punitive damages and stated that, in cases involving substantial actual or compensatory damages, punitive damages generally should not exceed the amount of compensatory damages.
In October 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court granted review of the case, directed the Oregon Court of Appeals to vacate its June 2002 opinion and ordered reconsideration of the case in view of State Farm. However, the Oregon Court of Appeals, and now the state's Supreme Court, rejected the U.S. Supreme Court's holdings regarding punitive damages.
"Because this decision violates the rules set forth in State Farm, Philip Morris USA will once again seek review of this case by the U.S. Supreme Court," said William S. Ohlemeyer, Philip Morris USA vice president and associate general counsel.
The lawsuit, known as the Williams-Branch case, was brought on behalf of the family of Jesse Williams, a longtime smoker who died of cancer. In 1999, the jury awarded $821,000 in compensatory or actual damages, which were reduced under state law to $521,000. The trial court reduced the punitive damages award to $32 million, but in a June 2002 ruling the Oregon Court of Appeals reinstated the original $79.5 million punitive damage award.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- CORRECTION FROM SOURCE/Media Advisory: Fallen Canadian Soldiers and Journalist Return Home
- Fox Networks Group and Bright House Networks Strike Comprehensive Deal to Distribute Fox Broadcast Stations, National Cable and Regional Sports Networks
- Fox Networks Group and Time Warner Cable Strike Comprehensive Deal to Distribute Fox Broadcast Stations, National Cable and Regional Sports Networks
- Houston Radio D.J. Kevin Kline Completes 500-Mile, 13-Day Ultramarathon Across Texas for Kids with Cancer
- Seaspan Corporation Provides Information on the CSCL Hamburg
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Using object-oriented analysis and design over traditional structured analysis and design
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions



