Business Services Industry
DTCC Corrects Misrepresentation on Naked Short Selling Litigation
Business Wire, Jan 27, 2006
NEW YORK -- The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation today announced its intention to correct the continuing misrepresentation being put out by third parties on DTCC and naked short selling litigation.
To date, 14 suits have been brought against DTCC or its subsidiaries involving naked short selling. Of these 14 cases, 9 were either dismissed by the courts or withdrawn by the plaintiffs. In 4 cases, suits were filed, but DTCC and its subsidiaries were never served.
In dismissing one case in Nevada brought by Nanopierce Technologies, Inc., Judge Brent Adams wrote, "(S)tate law may not be applied as to impose damages on (DTCC). To do this would be to forbid Defendants from doing what the SEC authorized them to do."
"We are concerned about the continuing effort by third party groups to mischaracterize and misrepresent the facts surrounding these lawsuits and the degree of concern over this issue," said Larry Thompson, DTCC general counsel and managing director. "From what regulators have said, there is little empirical evidence that widespread abuses such as naked short selling are occurring."
DTCC subsidiaries clear and settle trades. Short selling and naked short selling are trading strategies regulated by the marketplaces and the SEC. DTCC is involved after a trade is completed at the marketplace. DTCC does not have regulatory powers or regulatory responsibility over trading or to forcing the completion of trades that fail. As the SEC has stated, fails can be the result of a wide range of factors.
The SEC has also pointed out that their efforts, in promulgating Reg SHO to effectively safeguard extended fails associated with short selling or naked short selling have been successful in achieving their goal.
A complete list of the cases and their disposition as of today follows:
Cases Filed Against The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC)
and its Affiliates Related to the Issue of Naked Short Selling
--------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Case Filed Disposition
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Williamson v. January 31, 2003 Dismissed by court, March 17,
Goldman, Sachs 2004 (as to moving defendants
& Co., et al. - DTCC Defendants never
served)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Nutek v. March 21, 2003 Dismissed voluntarily as
Ameritrade, against DTCC Defendants, July
Inc., et al. 30, 2004
----------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Genemax Corp. v. November 14, 2003 Dismissed by court, November 9,
Knight 2004 (DTCC Defendants not
Securities, LP, served)
et al.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Capece v. April 28, 2004 Dismissed voluntarily by
Elgindy, et al. plaintiff as against DTCC
Defendants, August 3, 2004
----------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Nanopierce April 29, 2004 Dismissed by court on DTCC
Technologies, Defendants' motion to dismiss,
Inc. v. The April 28, 2005. Appeal
Depository pending in Supreme Court of
Trust Co., et Nevada
al.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Sporn v. August 30, 2004 Dismissed by court on DTCC
Elgindy, et al. Defendants' motion to dismiss,
July 25, 2005. Sanctions
awarded in favor of DTCC
Defendants
----------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Walters v. DTCC, August 30, 2004 Dismissed by court on DTCC
et al. Defendants' motion to dismiss
(no opposition filed),
December 7, 2004
----------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Pet Quarters, October 29, 2004 DTCC Defendants' motion to
Inc. v. The dismiss and plaintiffs' motion
Depository to remand to state court
Trust & pending
Clearing
Corporation, et
al.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Capece v. DTCC, April 29, 2005 Dismissed by court on DTCC
et al. Defendants' motion, October
11, 2005
----------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Whistler May 12, 2005 DTCC Defendants' motion to
Investments, dismiss pending (argument to
Inc. v. DTCC, be heard February 6, 2006)
et al.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Miller, as January, 2006 Filed, not served.
Trustee v.
Boston Partners
Management LP,
et al.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Related Early Cases
-------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. X-Clearing Corporation v. February 18, 2003 Dismissed by court
Depository Trust on DTCC Defendants
Corporation, et al. motion to dismiss,
(Intergold, Inc. action) October 3, 2003
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Intergold Corporation v. March 10, 2003 Filed, never served
Depository Trust
Corporation, et al.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
3. X-Clearing Corporation v. February 25, 2003 Dismissed by court
Depository Trust Corporation, on DTCC Defendants'
et al. motion to dismiss,
(Petrogen Corp. action) September 5, 2003
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn’t Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions



