Business Services Industry
Court Approves $100 Million Settlement in Class Action Against American Express Financial Advisors
Business Wire, July 24, 2007
SAN FRANCISCO -- On July 19, 2007, U.S. District Court Judge Deborah A. Batts, Southern District of New York, entered an order granting final approval of a $100 million settlement of the class action lawsuit brought by customers of American Express Financial Advisors ("AEFA," now known as Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.) NYSE: AMP. As part of the settlement, AEFA also agreed to adopt and implement specific remedial measures.
The settlement resolves claims that AEFA violated federal securities laws and breached fiduciary duties by perpetrating a scheme to defraud its investing clients. Specifically, it is alleged that AEFA, while claiming to provide objective financial planning and advice tailored to its clients, actually dispensed standardized recommendations and employed incentive programs for financial advisors to sell American Express proprietary products. AEFA has denied any wrongdoing or that its clients have suffered any damages.
This settlement resolves five consolidated actions filed in New York, plus a related action in Arizona. The class was represented by lead attorney, Daniel Girard of Girard Gibbs in conjunction with co-lead counsel from the law firms of Milberg Weiss LLP and Stull, Stull & Brody. Plaintiffs in the Arizona case were represented by lead attorneys from Zimmerman Reed and Lockridge Grindal Nauen.
Following a final approval hearing held on July 13, 2007, the Court approved the settlement as fair, reasonable and adequate. Under the settlement terms, the Company will pay $100 million to individuals who purchased financial advice, financial plans or other financial advisory services from AEFA. In addition to the settlement fund, AEFA is also responsible for the costs of settlement and claims administration, estimated between $15 million and $18 million.
Of the 2.8 million potential claimants who received notice of the settlement, more than one million claims have been filed. This figure represents significant participation in the settlement. The Court acknowledged that by voting with their feet, the vast number of claimants demonstrated the fairness of the settlement. According to lead attorney for the class, Daniel Girard, "We are very pleased to have obtained over $115 million in value for the class members. The relative percentage of claimants is one of the highest we have ever seen and with that level of participation, we are confident that the best interests of the class have been served through the resolution of this litigation."
Additional information concerning the settlement and a copy of the Final Judgment and Order can be obtained at www.financialfeesettlement.com.
Girard Gibbs LLP is one of the nation's leading firms representing individual and institutional investors in securities fraud class actions and litigation to correct abusive corporate governance practices, breaches of fiduciary duty and proxy violations. For more information, please access the firm's web site, www.girardgibbs.com.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions


