Business Services Industry

MetroPCS Announces Withdrawal of Proposal to Merge with Leap Wireless

Business Wire, Nov 1, 2007

DALLAS -- On September 4, 2007, MetroPCS Communications, Inc. (NYSE: PCS) announced a proposal to engage in a stock-for-stock tax-free merger with Leap Wireless International, Inc. (NASDAQ: LEAP). While there is widespread investor and analyst enthusiasm for a merger between the two companies, MetroPCS has not been able to engage Leap in meaningful negotiations regarding MetroPCS' merger proposal. As a result, MetroPCS today announced that it is withdrawing its merger proposal.

MetroPCS believes strongly in its stand-alone prospects and will continue to focus on realizing its significant growth opportunities. In addition to the recent service launch in Los Angeles, MetroPCS expects additional new market launches by the end of 2008 or early 2009 as well as ongoing increased penetration in existing markets to continue to drive growth and create value for MetroPCS' shareholders.

About MetroPCS Communications, Inc.

Dallas-based MetroPCS Communications, Inc. (NYSE: PCS) is a provider of unlimited wireless communications service for a flat rate with no signed contract. MetroPCS owns or has access to licenses covering a population of approximately 140 million people in 14 of the top 25 largest metropolitan areas in the United States, including New York, Philadelphia, Boston, Miami, Orlando, Sarasota, Tampa, Atlanta, Dallas, Detroit, Los Angeles, Las Vegas, San Francisco and Sacramento. As of September 30, 2007, MetroPCS had over 3.6 million subscribers and offers service in the Miami, Orlando, Sarasota, Tampa, Atlanta, Dallas, Detroit, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Sacramento metropolitan areas.

Forward-Looking Statements

Any statements made in this release that are not statements of historical fact, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, including the proposed business combination of MetroPCS and Leap, the potential synergies, the potential costs and benefits of any such transaction, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and should be evaluated as such. Forward-looking statements include information concerning any potential synergies arising from a business combination, including reductions in costs, the realization of operating efficiencies, improvements in penetration, and improvements in churn, as well as statements that may relate to our plans, objectives, strategies, goals, future events, future revenues or performance, future penetration rates, planned market launches, capital expenditures, financing needs and other information that is not historical information. These forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as "anticipate," "expect," "suggests," "plan," "believe," "intend," "estimates," "targets," "projects," "could," "should," "may," "will," "would," "continue," "forecast," and other similar expressions. We base these forward-looking statements or projections on our current expectations, plans and assumptions that we have made in light of our experience in the industry, as well as our perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements and projections are based on reasonable assumptions at the time they are made, you should be aware that many factors could affect our actual financial results, performance or results of operations and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements and projections. Factors that may materially affect such forward-looking statements and projections include: our ability to integrate the businesses of the companies; a failure to fully realize the expected benefits from the transaction, or a failure to realize such benefits within the expected time frame, including a failure to reduce costs and churn and the ability to realize operating efficiencies; even if achieved, the synergies may not result in a higher stock price for the combined company; greater than expected operating costs, customer loss and business disruption, including, without limitation, difficulties in maintaining relationships with employees, customers, clients or suppliers following the transaction; delays in obtaining the regulatory or shareholder approvals required for the transaction, or an inability to obtain them on the terms proposed or on the anticipated schedule; the highly competitive nature of our industry; our ability to clear the Auction 66 Market spectrum of incumbent licensees; the rapid technological changes in our industry; our ability to sustain the growth rates we have experienced to date; each company's ability to construct and launch future markets within projected time frames; our ability to manage our rapid growth, train additional personnel and improve our financial and disclosure controls and procedures; our ability to secure the necessary spectrum and network infrastructure equipment; the indebtedness amounts of the combined company and our ability to assume or refinance Leap's debt; changes in consumer preferences or demand for our products; our inability to attract and retain key members of management; and other factors described in MetroPCS' and Leap's respective periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"). We do not intend to, and do not undertake a duty to, update any forward-looking statement or projection in the future to reflect the occurrence of events or circumstances, except as required by law.


 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here

Content provided in partnership with Thompson Gale