Business Services Industry
FDA Advisory Committee Recommends Medtronic's Endeavor® Drug-Eluting Stent for Approval
Business Wire, Oct 10, 2007
Next-Generation DES Represents Promising New Treatment Option for Coronary Artery Disease
MINNEAPOLIS -- The last bullet point following, "Highlights from the clinical studies of the Endeavor stent include the following findings:" should read, "In the ENDEAVOR IV clinical trial at nine months, the overall stent thrombosis rate was 0.8 percent (protocol defined), and there were no stent thrombosis observed after six months." sted "In the ENDEAVOR IV clinical trial at nine months, the overall stent thrombosis rate was 0.5 percent (protocol defined), and there were no stent thrombosis observed after six months."
The corrected release reads:
FDA ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS MEDTRONIC'S ENDEAVOR([R]) DRUG-ELUTING STENT FOR APPROVAL
Next-Generation DES Represents Promising New Treatment Option for Coronary Artery Disease
Medtronic, Inc. (NYSE:MDT), announced today that a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee has unanimously recommended the company's Endeavor([R]) drug-eluting stent for conditional approval as a treatment for coronary artery disease. This action positions the Endeavor stent to become the first new drug-eluting stent to be introduced in the United States since 2004.
Meeting today in Gaithersburg, Md., FDA's Circulatory System Devices Panel voted unanimously to recommend the Endeavor stent for approval with conditions related to product labeling and post-market study requirements. The advisory committee recommended that the product's labeling reflect the clinical trial protocol use of dual anti-platelet therapy and the available professional society guidelines on their use. The panel also recommended a post-market single-arm registry of at least 5,000 patients followed to a minimum of five years with a primary endpoint of very late stent thrombosis (ARC defined) and a secondary endpoint evaluating death and myocardial infarction. This recommendation is consistent with Medtronic's proposal for a post-market study.
The FDA usually follows the recommendations of its advisory committees.
"We are very pleased with the outcome of today's panel meeting and appreciate the advisory committee's careful consideration of the extensive data on the Endeavor stent," said Scott Ward, president of Medtronic's CardioVascular business. "We will continue to work with the FDA to bring the Endeavor stent to the U.S. market as soon as possible so that patients and physicians in the U.S. can benefit from this next-generation technology. We believe that Endeavor provides the optimal combination of safety, efficacy and deliverability."
The Endeavor drug-eluting stent is commercially available in more than 100 countries outside the United States. In the United States, it remains an investigational device and is not yet approved for commercial use.
Medtronic presented the advisory committee with clinical data on more than 2,100 patients who have been treated with the Endeavor stent as participants in the ENDEAVOR Clinical Program, including 1,287 patients studied for two years and 675 patients studied for three years. The volume of data from the ENDEAVOR Clinical Program represents the largest body of scientific evidence ever submitted to the FDA to support the approval of a new drug-eluting stent.
Highlights from the clinical studies of the Endeavor stent include the following findings:
* Endeavor reduced restenosis in patients by more than 60 percent over its bare metal stent comparator, Medtronic's Driver([R]) bare metal stent, at nine months.
* The reduction in restenosis is sustained over time as Endeavor showed a 92.8 percent freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at three years, meaning less than 8.0 percent of patients had to return for a repeat procedure in the three years after receiving the stent.
* Endeavor patients had low rates of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and stent thrombosis with long-term follow-up to three years.
* 99.0 percent of Endeavor clinical patients have survived without a cardiac death beyond three years after implant; 97.3 percent of the Endeavor clinical patients have been free from heart attack (MI) at three years.
* There is no evidence of increased stent thrombosis risk within one year (0.7 percent Endeavor vs. 1.3 percent Driver per ARC definite/probable) or in years one to three (0.1 percent Endeavor vs. 0.2 percent Driver) in patients treated with the Endeavor stent compared with those treated with the Driver bare metal stent.
* In the ENDEAVOR IV clinical trial at nine months, the overall stent thrombosis rate was 0.8 percent (protocol defined), and there were no stent thrombosis observed after six months.
"The Endeavor drug-eluting stent significantly reduces restenosis and the need for repeat procedures while maintaining an excellent long-term safety profile," according to Martin B. Leon, Columbia University Medical Center, N.Y., and principal investigator of the ENDEAVOR III and ENDEAVOR IV Clinical Trials. "Importantly, rates of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis are exceptionally low with the Endeavor stent out to three years of patient follow-up. The device's consistently strong clinical performance will make the Endeavor stent a welcome addition to the practice of interventional cardiology in the United States."
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn’t Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions


