Business Services Industry
Data from Satraplatin SPARC Phase 3 Trial in Patients with Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer Progressing after Initial Chemotherapy Presented at 44th ASCO Annual Meeting
Business Wire, June 2, 2008
MARTINSRIED/MUNICH, Germany & PRINCETON, N.J. -- GPC Biotech AG (Frankfurt Stock Exchange: GPC, NASDAQ: GPCB) today announced the presentation of the overall survival results from the double-blind, randomized satraplatin Phase 3 registrational trial, the SPARC trial (Satraplatin and Prednisone Against Refractory Cancer). The data were presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Chicago. The SPARC trial evaluated satraplatin plus prednisone versus placebo plus prednisone in 950 patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) that had progressed after initial chemotherapy.
While data presented previously did show a statistically significant improvement in the progression-free survival endpoint, the trial did not achieve the endpoint of overall survival (p=0.80, log rank analysis) for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The median was 61.3 weeks for the satraplatin arm compared to 61.4 weeks for the control group, and the hazard ratio, stratified by the pre-specified randomization factors1, was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.15). The median in the patient group previously treated with docetaxel (Taxotere([R])) was 66.1 weeks for the satraplatin arm compared to 62.9 weeks for the control arm. The stratified hazard ratio was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.72, 1.14).
When adjusted for the three pre-specified prognostic factors which showed statistically significant imbalances between the two treatment arms (lactate dehydrogenase, hemoglobin and alkaline phosphatase), the hazard ratio for the ITT group was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.74, 1.03). Importantly, when adjusted for the three significant prognostic factors, there was a positive trend observed in those patients who had progressed after receiving docetaxel, with a hazard ratio of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.99).
"There is a need for new therapies for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer whose disease has progressed after initial chemotherapy treatment," said A. Oliver Sartor, M.D., Piltz Endowed Professor of Cancer Research and Professor of Medicine and Urology, Tulane Medical School, and one of the principal investigators of the SPARC trial. "While satraplatin did not improve overall survival in the intent-to-treat population, there was a positive trend observed in patients who progressed after Taxotere treatment when adjusted for significant prognostic factors. Additionally, I believe that satraplatin has been shown to be a well tolerated treatment that has demonstrated an important benefit for patients by showing a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival, as well as pain, tumor and PSA response rates in the overall patient population."
Of note, a significant number of patients received additional cancer therapies after they progressed in the SPARC trial. In the control arm, 68.6% of patients received some form of third-line therapy, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy and other treatments, versus 61.7% of patients in the satraplatin arm. In the control arm, 52.4% of patients received chemotherapy compared to 44.7% in the satraplatin arm, and 24.4% of patients in the control arm were treated with Taxotere following progression in the SPARC trial compared to 18.3% in the satraplatin arm. Taxotere is considered the standard of care in the first-line treatment of HRPC patients in the United States and many countries in Europe.
Safety findings in the SPARC trial were consistent with previous clinical studies involving satraplatin. Myelosuppression (decrease in the production of blood cells by the bone marrow) was the most common adverse reaction associated with satraplatin therapy, with 98.9% of patients in the satraplatin arm experiencing myelosuppression of any grade. A total of 22.6% of patients in the satraplatin arm experienced grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia; 14.5% had grade 3 or 4 leucopenia; 22.3% had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and 11.9% experienced grade 3 or 4 anemia. Gastrointestinal toxicities of any grade were the most frequent non-hematological adverse events (occurring in 59.5% of the patients receiving satraplatin). A total of 7.8% of patients in the satraplatin arm experienced grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal toxicities, including nausea (1.4%), vomiting (1.6%), diarrhea (1.9%) and constipation (1.9%). Additionally, 5% or less of patients in the satraplatin arm experienced grade 3 or 4 fatigue (1.9%), grade 3 or 4 infections (4.3%) and pulmonary/respiratory grade 3 or 4 toxicities (3.3%).
About Satraplatin
Satraplatin, an investigational drug, is a member of the platinum family of compounds. Platinum-based drugs are a critical part of modern chemotherapy treatments and are used to treat a wide variety of cancers. All platinum drugs currently on the market require intravenous administration. Satraplatin is an oral compound that clinical trial patients are able to take at home. A Marketing Authorization Application for satraplatin in combination with prednisone is currently under review in Europe for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients whose prior chemotherapy has failed. A decision on the filing by the European regulators is expected in the second half of 2008. Celgene Corporation is responsible for the regulatory filings for satraplatin and its development and commercialization for Europe and certain other territories. GPC Biotech also has a license agreement with Yakult Honsha Co. Ltd. under which Yakult has exclusive commercialization rights to satraplatin for Japan and is taking the lead in developing the drug in that territory. GPC Biotech in-licensed satraplatin from Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in 2002.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions




