Business Services Industry

Fitch Rates Partners HealthCare System, Massachusetts $172MM 2008H Bonds 'AA/F1+'

Business Wire, March 28, 2008

TAMPA, Fla. -- Fitch Ratings has assigned a long-term rating of 'AA' and a short-term rating of 'F1 ' to Partners HealthCare System (Partners) $172 million series 2008H bonds that will be used to refinance the bonds listed below. Fitch also affirms its 'AA' long-term rating on all of Partners' outstanding debt and affirms its 'F1 ' rating on approximately $184.5 million of Partners HealthCare System's debt that is currently backed by self-liquidity. For certain issues, the ratings are underlying ratings given without consideration of credit enhancement. The Rating Outlook is Stable.

--$75,000,000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority revenue bonds (Partners HealthCare System), series 2007 G1 auction rate bonds.

--$75,000,000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority revenue bonds (Partners HealthCare System), series 2007 G3 auction rate bonds.

--$20,900,000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority revenue bonds (Newton-Wellesley Hospital) MBIA-insured variable rate demand bonds series 1995F.

The 'F1 ' rating is supported by Partners' long-term rating and same-day liquidity at December 2007 of $945.9 million, which would cover the series 2003 D-1, D-2, D-5 and D-6 variable rate demand bonds and the series 2008 H bonds by 2.65 times (x) in the unlikely event of an un-remarketed put. The long-term ratings are supported by Partners' leading market position, its very strong clinical reputation, solid liquidity, improved operating profitability, and good management practices related to revenue cycle, expense control and quality outcomes. At fiscal year-end 2007, Partners had over $4.1 billion in unrestricted cash and investments (inclusive of temporarily restricted net assets, net of pledges) equating to 246 days cash on hand. Partners posted a 1.6% operating margin ($105.9 million) in fiscal 2007, and through the three months ended Dec. 31, 2007 (the interim period) had income from operations of $17.7 million resulting in an operating margin of 1.04%.

Bottom line performance was 8.4% ($583.1 million) and 4.6% ($81.36 million) in fiscal 2007 and through the interim period, respectively. Debt service coverage of maximum annual debt service ($238 million, inclusive of third party debt and research leases) remained solid at 4.1x, which is strong when considering that Partners' debt service declines significantly over time. Partners has successfully completed negotiations to include in its principal managed care contracts pay-for-performance incentives on selected procedures, which Fitch views favorably.

Fitch's prime concerns continue to be Partners' high Medicaid mix and increased charity care at certain facilities, the concentration of three large managed care organizations that control a significant 80% of the managed care payer market, the competitive Boston market, and future capital needs. Partners has incurred significant losses in Medicare and Medicaid and uncompensated care, which has hindered overall profitability.

Based in Boston, Partners comprises two tertiary hospitals, six community acute care hospitals, and four specialty hospitals. Partners generated $6.48 billion in total revenues in fiscal 2007. Disclosure of financial and operating results and material events has been excellent. Partners' practice is to publish and provide quarterly results publicly, including posting to DAC, and directly to requesting bondholders. Quarterly disclosure includes a balance sheet, income statement, cash flow statement, management discussion and analysis, and utilization data.

Fitch's rating definitions and the terms of use of such ratings are available on the agency's public site, www.fitchratings.com. Published ratings, criteria and methodologies are available from this site, at all times. Fitch's code of conduct, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, affiliate firewall, compliance and other relevant policies and procedures are also available from the 'Code of Conduct' section of this site.

COPYRIGHT 2008 Business Wire
COPYRIGHT 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning

 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here

Content provided in partnership with Thompson Gale

Most Recent Business Articles

Most Recent Business Publications

Most Popular Business Articles

Most Popular Business Publications

  • Your Work How to Win at Office Politics

    How to Win at Office Politics

    Like it or not, every workplace is a political environment. But operating effectively within it doesn’t have to mean sucking up, lying, or slinging dirt. In its purest form, office politics is simply about getting from here to there: securing a promotion, seeing an idea come to fruition, or gaining support to make an organizational change. Playing the game well is about defending your position, earning respect, exchanging favors, and keeping your sanity amid the chaos. To get started, you need to know what you really want from work, then orient your political moves toward those goals. It all starts with strong relationships and helping others; those people in return make up the support system that helps you realize your goals. Here’s how it’s done.

  • Your Industry The Five Worst Drug Companies of 2009

    The Five Worst Drug Companies of 2009

    These five companies have performed even worse than their peers and competitors. Investigations? Insider trading? Dirty factories? Recalls? Management churn? Scandals? They've got it all. In order of incompetence, BNET presents the five worst drug companies of 2009. Drumroll, please ...

  • Your Money Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money

    Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money

    Even smart people make financial moves that are downright illogical. Emotions and superstitions have a sneaky way of keeping you from rational financial decisions. But dumb choices can have serious, real-world consequences. Here are some of the biggest blunders we all make, plus tips from the experts on how to keep cool.