Manufacturing Industry
Samsung sues Sandisk in flash patent squabble
Electronic News, Oct 16, 1995 by Andrew MacLellan
San Jose, Calif.--Unable to settle a dispute involving the manufacture of NAND EEPROM flash memory products, Samsung Semiconductor filed suit in federal court charging flash memory designer SanDisk with patent infringement and harassment.
As stated in a complaint filed Oct. 3 by Samsung in U.S. District Court here, the allegations stem from an ongoing dispute in which SanDisk first accused Samsung of violating five patents while manufacturing on one or more EEPROM products. According to Samsung legal counsel William L. Geary Jr., SanDisk--known at the time as SunDisk--raised the issue of patent infringement with his client in March. After a series of meetings failed to resolve the issue, Mr. Geary said SanDisk began to spread word of the alleged violation to "present and potential" Samsung customers.
Samsung's complaint states the SanDisk action was "made with the express intent to intimidate Samsung's customers and discourage those customers from purchasing Samsung's products" and seeks both punitive and compensatory damages for potential lost sales and damage to its reputation.
"It got to the point where SanDisk was contacting our customers and really interfering with our business, and we felt strongly that we don't infringe the (SanDisk) patents," Mr. Geary said. "Flash memory covers a very broad range of technology, and our technology is very different from that used by SanDisk."
The $63.85 billion Korean semiconductor manufacturer countered SanDisk's claim of patent infringement with charges of its own for which it is seeking triple damages. Samsung alleges its '358 and '023 patents, both issued in 1980, are being violated by SanDisk: a patent for PROM decoder circuitry which increases the programming speed of memory devices and one for technology which assists in the manufacture of a self-aligned, silicon-gate field effect device. Samsung has also asked the court to render a declaratory judgment on the five SanDisk-held patents but will request no formal, monetary settlement until a full accounting of actual and projected losses has been conducted.
When interviewed last week following SanDisk's announcement of a new de facto standards group for its flash memory technology (see story, page 1), SanDisk president and CEO Eli Harari declined to comment on the lawsuit.
Attorneys for SanDisk issued a written statement denying the charges, saying in part: "The company believes that it does not infringe any valid claim of the Samsung patents. Moreover, SanDisk intends to vigorously enforce its patents against Samsung."
SanDisk is in the process of re-aligning itself as a publicly traded company and is going through a "quiet period" prior to its initial public offering. A U.S. District Court clerk said as of last Thursday afternoon SanDisk had not filed a written response to the Samsung complaint.
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics


