Manufacturing Industry
Avant!, Cadence granted split decision by court
Electronic News, March 24, 1997 by Judy Erkanat
"This decision puts to rest Gerald Hsu's claims that Avant! did not steal Cadence trade secrets and that Cadence's lawsuit is unfounded," said Mr. Costello. "Cadence will press for an early trial date to remove all tainted Avant! products from the market, and collect compensatory and punitive damages. In the meantime, the order makes clear that Avant! continues to ship tainted products at its own peril."
Cadence was also ordered to post a $50,000 bond as a condition of the injunction for payment of any damages incurred by Avant! if it is ultimately found innocent.
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions



