Reducing racism, sexism, and homophobia in college students by completing a psychology of prejudice course
College Student Journal, June, 2008 by Terry F. Pettijohn, II, Amy S. Walzer
Students enrolled in Psychology of Prejudice and Introductory Psychology courses completed measures of racism, sexism, and attitudes toward homosexuals at the beginning and end of the term. We predicted that those who took part in the Psychology of Prejudice class would have significantly reduced prejudice as a result of the course experience. We also predicted that the Introductory Psychology students would show a minimal decrease in prejudice. As predicted, students in the prejudice class showed significant decreases in prejudice, while the introductory psychology students did not. Course involvement was related to greater prejudice reduction in two prejudice areas, but course grade was not related to prejudice reduction. We discuss the implications for prejudice reduction through class activities and education.
More Articles of Interest
- The pervasiveness of racial prejudice in higher education in the U.S: raising...
- Differentiating among outgroups: predictors of congruent and discordant...
- Heterosexism and homophobia among college students
- The utility of Allport's conditions of intergroup contact for predicting...
- Television and Prejudice Reduction: When Does Television as a Vicarious...
**********
Prejudice is a serious issue that has perpetually faced humankind. Allport (1979) defined prejudice as a "feeling, favorable or unfavorable, toward a person or thing, prior to, or not based on, actual experience" (p. 6). Prejudice is unusually negative and causes individuals to form preconceived notions of groups, assuming that all group members are the same. People's perceptions of others are filtered through their previous experiences and attitudes. Therefore, it is important to consider the outgroup as well as the individual when studying prejudice.
Psychologists have studied the causes and consequences of prejudice and have developed effective prejudice reduction techniques based on education and experience. School-based interventions have shown that talking about race and racial attitudes and focusing on internal attributions instead of race can reduce prejudice (Aboud & Fenwick, 1999). Cognition, affect, and behavior all play a role in students transferring what they learn in the classroom to the real world, and students can find ways to reduce prejudice on an interpersonal level (Harris, 2003). Multicultural education and diversity appreciation training has been effective in reducing prejudice among counseling trainees (Kiselica, Maben & Locke, 1999). Students who took part in a prejudice and conflict seminar had significantly lower anti-Black attitudes when compared with other students who had not taken the seminar (Rudman & Ashmore, 2001). In college, attitudes toward homosexuals improved with the amount of college education (Schellenberg, Hirt, & Sears, 1999) and students who completed a diversity course reported less racism and greater intergroup tolerance than those who did not take the course (Hogan & Mallott, 2005).
Individual-oriented techniques have been found to reduce contemporary prejudice. These techniques help individuals recognize the contradictions in their own personality and behavior, and therefore, become more tolerant of people of different groups. Intergroup approaches also help prejudiced people to realize that individuals comprising different groups are not homogeneous and begin to realize that each group is as assorted and diverse as their own. Recognizing the foundation of prejudice helps to reduce prejudice through intervention techniques (Dovidio & Gaertnet, 1999). Along these same lines, forcing people to be aware of their hypocrisy seems to be effective in reducing prejudice. Making people feel guilty and uncomfortable with their racism has been found to reduce aversive racists' prejudice towards Asians, although the hypocrisy technique did not seem to be as effective for those who were considered to be low in prejudice (Son Hing, Li, & Zanna, 2002).
Research shows that ingroup prejudice can be reduced through educational programs dealing with diversity. We were interested in the effects Psychology of Prejudice and Introductory Psychology courses have on racism, sexism, and homosexual attitudes in college students. In addition, we were interested in the relations between course outcomes, course involvement and prejudice reduction. If such courses assist in the reduction of prejudice, colleges may consider adding these courses to their curriculum and students may choose to sign-up for these courses to gain a greater understanding of human diversity.
In our study, completing a Psychology of Prejudice course was predicted to reduce racist, sexist, and homophobic attitudes in college students. Students who completed Introductory Psychology courses were also expected to show a decrease in these prejudice attitudes, although the reduction was predicted to be greater for the Psychology of Prejudice course that deals directly with these topics. Students who were more involved in the Psychology of Prejudice class and students who earned better grades in the class were also predicted to show the greatest prejudice reduction. To see significant changes in prejudice, we believed that students must learn theories and research and be able to become involved in discussions and exercises as part of the course experience.
Method
Participants
Thirty three undergraduate students enrolled in one section of Psychology of Prejudice and 66 undergraduates enrolled in two sections of Introductory Psychology participated. The students attended a small, private college and the first author (TFP) taught all class sections. Students in the Psychology of Prejudice class were 94% Caucasian, 3% African-American, and 3% Hispanic, with an average age of 20.58 years (SD = 1.35, range = 18-23). The students in Psychology of Prejudice were primarily Psychology majors (82%), whereas only 9% of the students in the Introductory Psychology courses were Psychology majors. Students in the Introductory Psychology classes were 95% Caucasian and 5% African-American, with an average age of 18.86 years (SD = 1.39, range = 18-25). The majority of students in Psychology of Prejudice were women (73%), as were the majority of students in Introductory Psychology (59%). All of the students in Psychology of Prejudice indicated that they were heterosexual and 97% of the students in Introductory Psychology selected the heterosexual sexual orientation option.
Most Recent Reference Articles
- ARAB EUROPEAN RELATIONS - Dec 22 - Russia Denies Selling Missile System To Iran
- EGYPT - Dec 29 - Opposition Says Mubarak Blessed Israeli Attacks
- ARAB AFFAIRS - Dec 22 - Syria Will Eventually Move To Direct Talks With Israel
- ARAB AFFAIRS - Dec 30 - GCC Denounces Massacre
- ARAB ISRAELI RELATIONS - Israel Issues An Appeal To Palestinians In Gaza
Most Recent Reference Publications
Most Popular Reference Articles
- How Tyler Perry rose from homelessness to a $5 million mansion
- 9 questions to ask your new lover: what you were afraid to ask, but always wanted to know
- Free Sex Change? Move To Idaho - Brief Article
- Vickie Winans: at home with the gospel star who lost 75 pounds and reenergized her career
- BEST HAIR SALONS in DALLAS, The


