New report studies injuries in the United States

AORN Journal, Nov, 2004

Unintentional injury is the fifth leading cause of death in the United States, and approximately one in every three people treated in an emergency department is treated for an injury, according to a Sept 2, 2004, news release from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A new, national report on fatal and nonfatal injuries says that 18 people in the United States die every hour from injures.

Researchers noted that in 2001, an estimated 29.7 million people were treated for nonfatal injuries in hospital emergency departments, and 1.6 million were hospitalized or transferred for specialized medical care. Traumatic brain injuries are a leading cause of injury deaths, accounting for approximately 50,000 deaths each year. More than 1.2 million cases of traumatic brain injuries were treated in 2001.

Other key findings of the report include the following.

* The incidence of fatal and nonfatal injuries was higher for men than women, and they disproportionately affected younger and older people.

* Overall, the leading cause of fatal injuries was motor vehicle traffic accidents, which accounted for almost 33,400 occupant deaths and more than 2.9 million nonfatal occupant injuries treated in hospital emergency departments.

* The Leading cause of nonfatal injuries was unintentional falls, accounting for more than 7.8 million nonfatal injuries treated in hospital emergency departments and more than 15,000 deaths.

* Violence-related injuries also take a toll on Americans. In 2001, almost 21,000 homicides and 31,000 suicides occurred, and almost 1.8 million people were assaulted. Approximately 323,000 harmed themselves and were treated in hospital emergency departments.

First National Summary Report Shows Magnitude of Injuries (news release, Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Sept 2, 2004) http://www.cdc .gov/od/oc/media/pressrel/fs040902.htm (accessed 9 Sept 2004).

Answer Sheet

A pragmatic and successful approach to treating nonsmall-cell Lung carcinoma

Please fill out the application and answer form on this page and the evaluation form on the back of this page. Tear the page out of the Journal or make photocopies and mail to:

AORN Customer Service c/o Home Study Program 2170 S Parker Rd, Suite 300 Denver, CO 80231-5711 or fax with credit card information to (303) 750-3212.

Additionally, please verify by signature that you have reviewed the objectives and read the article, or you will not receive credit.

Signature --

1. Record your AORN member identification number in the appropriate section below. (See your member card.)

2. Completely darken the spaces that indicate your answers to examination questions one through 10. Use blue or black ink only.

3. Our accrediting body requires that we verify the amount of time you required to complete this 3.7 contact hour (185-minute) program. --

4. Enclose fee if information is mailed.

AORN (ID) # -- Name -- Address -- City -- State -- Zip -- Phone number -- RN license # -- State -- Fee enclosed -- or bill the credit card indicated [] MC [] Visa [] American Express [] Discover Card # -- Expiration date --

Signature -- (for credit card authorization)

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

AORN Home Study

Event #04089 Session #8442

Contact hours: 3.7

Fee: Members $18.50 Nonmembers $37

Program offered November 2004

The deadline for this program is Nov. 30, 2007

A score of 70% correct on the examination is required for credit.

Learner Evaluation

A pragmatic and successful approach to treating nonsmall-cell Lung carcinoma

Objectives

To what extent were the following objectives of this Home Study Program achieved?

1. Discuss staging lung carcinoma for determining patient prognosis.

2. Explain preoperative assessment for patients undergoing treatment for nonsmall-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

3. Discuss perioperative nursing care provided for patients undergoing NSCLC surgery.

4. Describe patient outcomes achieved after treatment for NSCLC at Inova Fairfax Hospital.

Content

To what extent

5. did this article increase your knowledge of the subject matter?

6. was the content clear and organized?

7. did this article facilitate learning?

8. were your individual objectives met?

9. did the objectives relate to the overall purpose/goal?

Test Questions/Answers

To what extent

10. were they reflective of the content?

11. were they easy to understand?

12. did they address important points?

Learner Input

13. Will you be able to use the information from this Home Study in your work setting?

a. yes b. no

14. I learned of this Home Study via

a. the Journal I receive as an AORN member.

b. a Journal I obtained elsewhere.

c. the AORN web site.

d. SSM Online.

15. What factor most affects whether you take an AORN Journal Home Study?

a. need for contact hours

b. price

c. subject matter relevant to current position

d. number of contact hours offered What other topics would you like to see addressed in a future Home Study Program? Would you be interested or do you know someone who would be interested in writing an article on this topic?

Topic(s): --

Author names and addresses: --


 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with Thompson Gale