Cell phones and the brain

Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients, July, 2002 by John D. MacArthur

Commentary

Cell phones have many functional benefits and despite their downside are likely to be with us for a long time (as the internal partial-combustion engine has been). In the author's opinion, however, they are well on their way to becoming the "cigarettes" of this century. Already banned in some restaurants because of the annoying secondhand sound waves emanating from their users, cell phones may eventually be shunned for much more compelling reasons -- as the bioeffects of their microwaves are better understood.

The way cell phones are practically given away is reminiscent of how cigarettes were introduced into new markets. Eventually, phones too will probably have to carry warning labels that escalate in severity over the years. And, few people will be surprised if it's ultimately revealed that the telecommunications industry knew more about the negative effects of cell phone usage than they let on.

Today, we view classic films with a mixture of amusement and amazement as movie stars constantly smoke cigarettes in the most inappropriate situations, from baby rooms to bomb shelters. lathe future, when we look back at today's media celebration of cell phones, will we cringe at the sight of people holding these powerful electronic devices to their brains?

Correspondence:

John D. MacArthur

Website: www.getwrite.com

References

(1.) The British Expert Group report on Mobile Phones and Health (http://www.iegmp.org.uk/IECMPtxt.htm)

(2.) Scaiano JC, Cozena FL, McLean J, Model for the rationalization of magnetic field effects in viva. Application of the radical-pair mechanism to biological systems. Photochem Photobiol 1994 Jun;59(6):585-89.

(3.) Masaki KM, et al., Vitamins E and C protect against dementia, cognitive decline in elderly men. Neurology 2000;54:1265-72.

(4.) Lai H, Singh NP, Melatonin and N-tert-butyl-alpha-phenylnitrone block 60-Hz magnetic field-induced DNA single and double strand breaks in rat brain cells. J Pineal Res 1997 Apr;22(3):152-62.

(5.) Lai H, Singh NP, Melatonin and a spin-trap compound block radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation-induced DNA strand breaks in rot brain cello. Bioelectromagnetics 1997;38:446-54.

(6.) Lai H, Neurological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation, Mobile Phones and Health, Symposium, October 25-28, 1998, University of Vienna, Austria. (http://www.emfguru.com/Research/drhenry.html)

(7.) Iacovitti L, Stull ND, Johnston K, Melatonin rescues dopamine neurons from cell death in tissue culture models of oxidative stress. Brain Res 1997 Sep 12;768(12):317-26.

(8.) Graham C, Cook MR, Sastre A, Riffle DW, Gerkovich MM, Multi-night exposure to 60 Hz magnetic fields: effects on melatonin and its enzymatic metobolite. J Pineal Rex 2000 Jan;28(1):1-8.

(9.) Burch JB, Reif JS, Noonan CW, Yost MG, Melatonin metabolite levels in workers exposed to 69-Hz magnetic fields: work in substations and with 3-phase conductors. J Occup Environ Med 2000 Feb:42(2):136-42.

(10.) Kato M, Honma K, Shigemitsu T, Shiga Y, Circularly polarized 50-Hz magnetic field exposure reduces pineal gland and blood melatonin concentrations of Long-Evans rats. Neurosci Lett 1994 Jan 17:166(1):59-62.