Nickel and Bromide for Psoriasis - Letters to the Editor

Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients, August-Sept, 2003 by A. Banks

Editor:

I would like to discuss some things I learned in re: "Nickel and Bromide for Psoriasis" article (May 2003, #238, pg 88). I have read very many BAD things about nickel; one is that it is the most carcinogenic of all metals ... but anyway, I had mercury poisoning from the fillings in my teeth, and after the dental work, the detox of the mercury went on for months and repeated urine tests where no other things showed up. I learned after four other things showed up, including nickel, that mercury is the band leader here, and only when it is sufficiently reduced does it release other metals (lead, cadmium, nickel, etc.) and they come out with EDTA IVs.

Did you test these people with Doctor's Data Urine tests to see where their nickel was? Did they have high mercury?

In addition, I learned I had Pyrroles, which is Pyroluria, which nobody knows much about except it creates deficiencies in B6, zinc, and manganese, and this affects enzymes, preventing the heavy and other metals from being eliminated naturally.

It took me a year and a half on heavy doses of the Pyroluria formula in Joan Larson's 7 Weeks to Emotional Healing to get back to normal. So, did you test the psoriasis patients for deficiencies?

Last, is the man I know who had awful psoriasis and also had cancer later and lots of other stuff. His daughter has lupus, her daughters have all sorts of stuff, all related to allergies of some sort ... overactive immune systems, which are caused by something else besides your nickel cause. I would like to know what other things you tested these patients for in your trials as common denominators, to come up with only generally "moderate" improvement doesn't say much for adding a metal like nickel to the body, Looks a lot like the profit drove the results, to me.

A. Banks