Computer science majors: sex role orientation, academic achievement, and social cognitive factors
Career Development Quarterly, June, 2006 by Chris Brown, Linda S. Garavalia, Mary Lou Hines Fritts, Elizabeth A. Olson
1. The Rotter Internal-External Control Scale (I-E; Rotter, 1966) consists of 29 forced-choice items and measures the degree to which participants perceive reinforcement as contingent upon their actions. Six of the items are filler items to disguise the purpose of the test. Thus, the scale consists of 23 I-E items and 6 filler items. Higher scores indicate an external locus of control. Harrow and Ferrante (1969) reported test-retest reliability of .75 for psychiatric patients over a 6-week interval. Evidence of construct validity is supported by the close relationships between item content and patterns of environment control (Seeman & Evans, 1962).
More Articles of Interest
- The influence of gender, generation level, parents' education level, and...
- Basic Confidence predictors of career decision-making self-efficacy
- Culturally appropriate career counseling with gay and lesbian clients
- Children's vocational development: a research rationale
- Practice and research in career counseling and development2004
2. The Career Locus of Control Scale (CLCS; Trice, Haire, & Elliott, 1989) measures locus of control for career planning and consists of 18 statements scored on a true/false format. Scores range from 0 to 18 and are calculated by totaling the number of external responses. Higher scores indicate more external locus of control for career development. Trice et al. reported a test-retest reliability coefficient of .93 over a 3-week interval and Kuder Richardson (K-R 20) reliability estimates of .81 to .89 for college student samples. As evidence of construct validity, Trice et al. reported a positive correlation between CLCS scores and a variety of career development behaviors, such as job search and career exploration tasks.
Sex role orientation. The Personal Attributes Questionnaire (PAQ; Spence & Helmreich, 1978) is a 24-item self-report instrument composed of three scales (M, F, and M-F) that are computed by adding the 8 items comprising each scale, yielding scores that range from 0-32 on each of the three scales. The Masculinity (M) scale comprises self-assertive-instrumental traits (e.g., independent, competitive, aggressive) while the Femininity (F) scale consists of traits described as interpersonal-expressive (e.g., emotional, dependent, helpful). The Masculinity-Femininity (M-F) scale reflects self-assertive-instrumental or expressive-interpersonal characteristics, or a combination of both. Respondents are asked to rate themselves on 24 traits scored on a 5-point bipolar continuum, for example, from A (0) not at all aggressive to E (4) very aggressive. Spence and Helmreich (1978) provided cutoff scores on the M and F scales that reflect Masculine, Feminine, Androgynous, and Undifferentiated sex role classifications. Consistent with Spence and Helmreich's classification guidelines, cutoff scores on the Masculinity and Femininity scales were used to classify participants into the four sex role groups. The cutoff scores provided by Spence and Helmreich on the Masculinity and Femininity scales are the median scores for each scale and were based on their norm sample of 715 college students. As noted by Spence and Helmreich (1978), the burden lies with the researchers to scrutinize their data and determine whether the median-split method is appropriate. Evidence of the PAQ's psychometric soundness has been established, with validation evidence indicating that the PAQ differentiates between the sexes on each of the three scales. Spence and Helmreich (1978) reported Cronbach's alphas for the M and F scales of .85 and .82, respectively.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Using object-oriented analysis and design over traditional structured analysis and design
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions


